From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Helmut Eller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Generalizing find-definition Date: Thu, 06 Nov 2014 18:00:24 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20141102151524.0d9c665c@forcix> <20141102172944.0f7944e3@forcix> <20141103084433.12117c03@forcix> <86fvdwgxqs.fsf@yandex.ru> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1415293299 31069 80.91.229.3 (6 Nov 2014 17:01:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2014 17:01:39 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Nov 06 18:01:32 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XmQR2-0007Fk-4K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 18:01:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55095 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XmQR1-0003G3-IO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:01:23 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58620) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XmQQS-0002Te-Co for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:00:55 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XmQQK-0004a3-SG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:00:48 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54668) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XmQQK-0004Zq-Ca for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 12:00:40 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XmQQI-0006fk-Ju for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 18:00:38 +0100 Original-Received: from reserved-175243.pool.broadband44.net ([212.46.175.243]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 18:00:38 +0100 Original-Received: from eller.helmut by reserved-175243.pool.broadband44.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 06 Nov 2014 18:00:38 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: reserved-175243.pool.broadband44.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:fGDkULxM8rBOMhT3zLiug2BIcR0= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:176459 Archived-At: On Thu, Nov 06 2014, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> And if find-tag will provide the "multiple occurences" interface on >> its own, there won't be a need for the "next tag" command. > > Good point. If we don't have a such a global-map "next-tag" command > anymore, then I guess it's OK to change M-, to do the job of M-*. An idea would be to merge the next-error and next-tag commands. After all, they are quite similar. Helmut