From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "John Wiegley" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: IDE Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:03:57 -0700 Organization: New Artisans LLC Message-ID: References: <5610207A.2000300@harpegolden.net> <83fv1r3gzp.fsf@gnu.org> <83bncf3f9k.fsf@gnu.org> <5610E0BC.8090902@online.de> <83si5r106e.fsf@gnu.org> <831td9z18h.fsf@gnu.org> <5612E996.7090700@yandex.ru> <83bnc7tavr.fsf@gnu.org> <5618C92A.3040207@yandex.ru> <83a8rrt9ag.fsf@gnu.org> <871tcyexa9.fsf@fimbulvetr.bsc.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444752990 10465 80.91.229.3 (13 Oct 2015 16:16:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 16:16:30 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 13 18:16:26 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm2FU-000089-Le for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 18:16:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37243 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm2FU-0001Pu-1x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:16:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34553) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm2E4-0000Pe-Lv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:14:57 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm2E1-00059i-Do for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:14:56 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pa0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d]:33059) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm2E1-00059a-8X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 12:14:53 -0400 Original-Received: by pabrc13 with SMTP id rc13so25596300pab.0 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:14:52 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=sender:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:date:organization:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=pr1LHBk3/vtsXqzUBiMhElMMWhd22TPNe6k5dVky6yQ=; b=fvVe2bLyjQlnrbjF5Kl6NWklX7Vnu8lt4HR9/aCq/5ySGeTREBNucEtOKacvU9RvaM 00ColmK3sCXwL7v6FZ1LT+aYxYHJQfa6Kgeds9I+KjmbE5A9X19bJgBHFSjKTN22z35q Y1VQT7NtkTmdFcxcF6bxoP7OK1Wp6ULRX+9w49L6JMhtWk5+Eh3X398cAXVzbWOI0wvv n/XY9/yqjc2BNGZyufLXqRIJF/3cd0E6TR2FxdAZmkgGUOAM/Lp4/Ckwp7G6qxS88fQx 2DkPlOq3EVEJiNhTV0MNSKVNJnU8eclp9ZX8uj9matjB6BqSoxkn7HCMTJi+sbzJGABs z6dQ== X-Received: by 10.67.22.34 with SMTP id hp2mr32201808pad.92.1444752892587; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:14:52 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k10sm4681494pbq.78.2015.10.13.09.14.51 for (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:14:51 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9AAE1F2DB00F; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 09:14:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <871tcyexa9.fsf@fimbulvetr.bsc.es> (=?utf-8?Q?=22Llu=C3=ADs?= =?utf-8?Q?=22's?= message of "Tue, 13 Oct 2015 15:02:54 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c03::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191489 Archived-At: >>>>> Llu=C3=ADs writes: > Eli Zaretskii writes: > [...] >>> For C/C++, the community has Irony and Rtags, both based on libclang. If >>> libclang is unacceptable for you, you probably know a more appropriate >>> mailing list to bring that up at. >> Let's not reiterate past discussions: you forget CEDET. CEDET first came out in 2003. If it were the answer to our present question= s, we would not be asking them. I'm willing to hear how CEDET can offer solutions to issues we've brought u= p, but I won't curtail the discussion "because CEDET". I'm also OK with reiteration, because I wasn't present during those past discussions, and I want to know what is most relevant today. John