From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Very happy with emacs-25 so far Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:52:09 -0700 Message-ID: References: <83shzm70zv.fsf@gnu.org> <83k2kx7reo.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1458582977 7642 80.91.229.3 (21 Mar 2016 17:56:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 17:56:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bozhidar@batsov.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 21 18:56:01 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ai43W-0000qx-U9 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 18:55:55 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59540 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ai43W-0005uk-CT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:55:54 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33276) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ai435-0005uG-TN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:55:28 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ai435-0000R6-34 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:55:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::236]:36108) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ai42z-0000Pe-Hq; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 13:55:21 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x236.google.com with SMTP id u190so274082120pfb.3; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:55:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=NyaxdjhuUCH1ovIw1bQyOXpnPK3tsNnf2qSPRBhJa50=; b=e/WLCd9G6zDP2Sg+Z3q+VYt/s4VmChg5Km/BM27DGJq3yD6xd//YT0Klt91EZ6R5+O qlUQW5q+Zg7I11e8Z41l9IQHF5lTtVTdncLvKQOSi2UlZC8oMe67JRteK8LJswE7fR17 MVRvnfuElhpoeHKHF8X6Uz6cI/MBDlhqyCZY5foycM1EcgpB3XaHt07DAVoQlE9pc7DJ Kze2nYVzz7ZVTfXc8TNugIbury1NparmBf+WbnlcHxMahJMkqiQd9AKg7B6VS7oKGXeO i6ms92H/2RxqFabwh6b6ZwIdDXH9RYH0xExm1MIj4JpERRYqGOJLDHU0k8ABSJEBXrVA x9Fw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=NyaxdjhuUCH1ovIw1bQyOXpnPK3tsNnf2qSPRBhJa50=; b=QvWMnoJskcs5E1k3sbJqrFhyo8k5B4QvtpZ8Qw2h08ReXTACdyCOCH/LByG7jlTUd4 gcUplmsItNsLm2hetdd5cZopU1WxPAIUhxhnFdUck5C7tpCIHxVn3tB+p7/9F0TQD6t/ MIihBLyDiXgQUkJ7OX2frRh4iHaNSumO7Qhuas2TnvvJBJEDzHRMDLCiNJybKZLp2pfq fqFMHdVLUvO+v1MTRUYeDLmnSgSxrTG5xhFRQvOnhHQXre6FNLvJDmxnEzBFKI8zvdg4 n+6VOTQaPgRBDLc1mcCBT19JYTMOcgykZXAf2rSK6wfWODQoflrlRAhuEO0RtWuOuW/a QwzQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJKPoJiKquh2NU+BzeuCR3KI+LH4pcCw4G+PEtudBD20BJi/E1IIfhVzGFc1RY72iA== X-Received: by 10.98.74.17 with SMTP id x17mr47305930pfa.14.1458582920200; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:55:20 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 87sm42197136pfq.93.2016.03.21.10.55.18 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:55:18 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 3B0B9138DC60D; Mon, 21 Mar 2016 10:55:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83k2kx7reo.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 20 Mar 2016 05:35:27 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.92 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , bozhidar@batsov.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202015 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > What is the purpose of marking them as blocking the release if we don't > really mean that? Marking a bug as blocking the release does not mean we won't release, becau= se this would put our release schedule in the hands of anyone capable of setti= ng such a mark. What it does mean is: prior to cutting a release tarball, we will have addressed each bug, where by "address" we mean: 1. Fix it, or 2. Defer it to 25.2, or 3. Re-categorize as not really blocking It sounds like several of our current "blockers" should not have been marked such, so it looks like a bug review is in order. I'll put it on my schedule= to go through these and see which ones truly should not ship in 25.1. =2D-=20 John Wiegley GPG fingerprint =3D 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2 --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGcBAEBCgAGBQJW8DTJAAoJEMFE2PTxn+YwN2EL/Rozuzg0FWg8+RaF7hUU7vKg PGI/O71ADjECUYmLxUlhidtkUFwhRUIbSa3+Gtro4IPDgrJNUHvUVWbBgQHh9xTV ++u0zhcV0w40T+WIYZbIi0mwlVHPNhTTaRjFANG+L85EAKaKEugpIne0B15clrNO w9tO0kWsX2UNv4waobVxdA3wdRGFIC/amRmpj0nzPGA+OCGp22BLhN+koEiA2Jhz J6y31+c9mveTVL04T4ilPt7OSyXPrh4PP+7DliHe9eBxmPWBavWVqzZlPduEwAhQ 8MwcvqetsqXI6C4Jd1CDvskpHECvNH3OETsTVBZGavJnHNSUJBO1KVpL2IHReUIx Ppn70VWfadOaoku1dCtg/raDovekxEZ898AnvDrVRcoYYRrE8hGOi2rbYGFTtMhm h6tyqe+je1/H0qejRs6C8PTAiLFUicBodnPbzYR6I0PPgWaBFPSdLtdYJ5Kedch8 FSXCyNsJclr30/mUCsgjBSil7GRRSyah2/aj/e85zA== =vOWA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--