From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Gerd_M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS experiment successful Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2024 20:41:12 +0200 Message-ID: References: <86le5cgmp3.fsf@gnu.org> <86bk68gfab.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="8195"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 17 20:41:59 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rxAEH-0001rD-8I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 20:41:57 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxADi-000626-H0; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:41:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxADg-00061j-3s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:41:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rxADe-0005xO-4F; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 14:41:19 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2d895138ce6so1086931fa.0; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:41:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713379275; x=1713984075; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=k3Lvx3uZgityff6JyLiswR4/kbrInhco/FSPpYMGoFs=; b=PFC5pSumZ5vUx55P1mbu6Tg6FBNajkPvMKdcccuGbIHYGKfKpzFbqCqgh9ie+lacCC enZkXot7XqGdwr1hkL9tejOobPEIMmqpcn/38P3N1U3Tv5kyDP7JQqKHsI3X+2aJ7SDr xcnPN6utrNgToR7DVJmnOgEbS7usX7qeO+jYQ7T5Bf4su+VnMg1qby7UzKEy9Dc8DPd8 4HTV7Lm656+P7iT5WQPaKRxfe78215XaWMKwTgU/ydFQXINOc4J4X1VFPsenPmN0MWCc B0eY8HP/qAMx05npMdEHzYVwWbryDjoZo56tE0UXk54hS0ot1vU7GI0r9BesRBYYLYdP 9DiQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713379275; x=1713984075; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=k3Lvx3uZgityff6JyLiswR4/kbrInhco/FSPpYMGoFs=; b=BVe6jxdG49t6tx63JoJuosCX3NU4TzWFkDOhMHM2/mCt8CQQVdxb2Z3iU71dfgbdKE mSaKOX1awtFSnmt2sdZJM+fvB9CpwbmCfl47c3bjnvcZbjE6sUuBXGluNnlFuVoZCpfY l2IS3FSkuyc1RlBuG344gDHlCLGRE15tVfY2v1fEKsD4DLDLkYWKtyYxDasGFHY8Mzw5 XUBc7lqHXc2qyCwcYngtOyyXc1rgyPlST8HX2tDkP4CRBkoqM0VfqwyiH8fYbhOygnce eXjrOp2HzbJqbQjowJVtzLZxSKPNQcA7BxgUQFaJDIzXbPEx3P8wwJnjVjqPOgjM/MA5 v5Pw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YzmsKr/MVp/noRz44+efjCux2XMm3IB/IovVGOakGkUPjh/ir2Z KdsGunRD6HoAeo11zxUMsP3CSpEn47oWTg9ykb4HBkGGvwpsJAeW37b3QRoL X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHrCF5BcGxQKhPXo/Y5AT2aY3XNJnV1Hh3pzOJ3aqWNidxneF6qHjBMB5CGbKUc6vwooPF9Qw== X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8099:0:b0:2d7:61ac:b392 with SMTP id i25-20020a2e8099000000b002d761acb392mr87638ljg.29.1713379274304; Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:41:14 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Pro.fritz.box (pd9e3638b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.227.99.139]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i17-20020a05600c355100b0041892857924sm3692537wmq.36.2024.04.17.11.41.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 17 Apr 2024 11:41:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <86bk68gfab.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 17 Apr 2024 18:49:48 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::22a; envelope-from=gerd.moellmann@gmail.com; helo=mail-lj1-x22a.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:317782 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > The packages code will need to be moved aside, yes. But for the rest, > why shouldn't a simple merge do the job? They seem to be orthogonal, > by and large. Coming to think of it again - how would I tell git merge the difference between the package related changes and GC related changes?