From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Gerd_M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MPS: struct window, prev_buffers + next_buffers Date: Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:25:25 +0200 Message-ID: References: <861q4pjtn4.fsf@gnu.org> <86y16xiduv.fsf@gnu.org> <867cehi9wb.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="32719"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, eller.helmut@gmail.com To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 22 12:26:19 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sKxwp-0008JX-0S for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:26:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKxw7-0005Ww-Qh; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 06:25:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKxw3-0005Vt-5X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 06:25:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-x530.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::530]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sKxw1-0007w7-Kd; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 06:25:30 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-x530.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-57d1d45ba34so3058424a12.3; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 03:25:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1719051927; x=1719656727; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=As+Mcc+ndwMoGsb5AOvjXH3DoPPJeEIBq/G3OiR7Zb0=; b=Ik3bF/395biZVjhk5wJYfAdNPaISj7n5wPOkTGnb+tOc/NlhlXRvL4tczOL+lbcEtD EJM9xp4blBFM1RGddJtZBP9tjK6r6ZTwofgg91oIfgTRMAgxhcKWL17YYaXYsESyfcPJ +bijd0sBqonSgYzgSe/4DwFWVqyW7yfkJtr1xI5YfmyfyjG0JApOyb114UDpcU07TG1G rDN0ypX6fDOGzPvZiEvahfCcoOabBdms0vAgA6AoQUd3BtUFk/yl1lE3UixAiCq5Z/Dv bJZSSdGamuwVm1Xxu9vUIiMWSJxZ/AWB+Hd3HvwObWWNvpUmip/iLJ6Ev5MEglj4Hli9 SN1g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719051927; x=1719656727; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=As+Mcc+ndwMoGsb5AOvjXH3DoPPJeEIBq/G3OiR7Zb0=; b=DT8liOO6JTm/1hJog5H5tZxNReDEA+ZVa5YEwJsRG7Np5xnqMtubBbhJiPe4l2tHu+ PEhfWguYpQZicUjsEvhqkUp53QX2gJcD9yepuo5ap/dHU8C9tzigrmK3FGNPSdcVqHSP 6fWI4RvafGpzRc8Phs7ifyWo8LjM3CSV0N9+ScXWqiUPREtFlIZQBXlgtyy/EqU2fqxp 8M49Fjay/RenCcDINOwzCf0zhkHQ7G39jVBTKcQKCQoiqj1JM1/nsr2yOj8/N8gwztzl IH7FVqbWDlL+41FhZSNjc4JqM6E/fvQC/bWir6/C47ablvncXVHIBT7Rz9OgAfJHuzWa 1Lyw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yx3VXKtH34HfcaU3f1+ohlkL75sBT8N1L5j+ErRArMFUe54vxTo zq3/XMWwFvMdRVae2YVJHdALk7+oba9Tn3TpU+YyBxutgjehgGdrRAKTaA== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEyTQzm5ob0yWRcY+o6uOVwiqLu6XrsY28S8FbzNuEpklErmAylvzCrAdJ3snRGQjb+Wqtd6A== X-Received: by 2002:a50:d707:0:b0:57c:5fca:ab25 with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-57d07e84bf2mr6937565a12.25.1719051927215; Sat, 22 Jun 2024 03:25:27 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from pro2.fritz.box (pd9e364bf.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.227.100.191]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-57d30563440sm2128801a12.84.2024.06.22.03.25.26 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 22 Jun 2024 03:25:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <867cehi9wb.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 22 Jun 2024 12:50:28 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::530; envelope-from=gerd.moellmann@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x530.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:320466 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> I think I'll try to let window-{next,prev}-buffers clean the list >> before returning it. It doesn't look like something to me that a weak >> vector or something like that could solve. WDYT? > > That would work, but what if these functions are not called for a > while? Hm. I suspect it won't do much harm, from what I see here at least, with my usage pattern and config. > Also, it would make these simple accessors more expensive. True. I'll push something like what I said in a few minutes. Let's see how it fares.