From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: martin.yrjola@gmail.com (Martin =?utf-8?B?WXJqw7Zsw6Q=?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Mac port Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2016 12:50:13 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87bn9a8an8.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <87wprxfkvx.fsf@gmx.us> <568622AA.2000805@dancol.org> <615CB17D-3C40-477F-B576-3C3250C15202@gmail.com> <56862EFA.7020907@dancol.org> <87bn95p72f.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <382F6941-F317-45E4-9C4F-3A7D71E7AC24@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451991051 21299 80.91.229.3 (5 Jan 2016 10:50:51 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Jan 2016 10:50:51 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Chad Brown , YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 05 11:50:41 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aGPCF-0003JR-2k for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 11:50:35 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48939 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGPCE-0001zj-Ar for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 05:50:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36756) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGPC0-0001ze-Vt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 05:50:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGPBx-0002At-Mh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 05:50:20 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-lb0-x229.google.com ([2a00:1450:4010:c04::229]:33305) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aGPBx-0002Am-EN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 05:50:17 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-lb0-x229.google.com with SMTP id sv6so165351277lbb.0 for ; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 02:50:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yBX4zw04P8ZqocO21obbYEzyW5Y8jsOTyFjQDcFez90=; b=p2yzK4HwaMhatLV55UrMgxb7+S4kUAnK6NgfSPKrUQAmZEXPJiaRYoRAugzLhHNSEu keUYJTNzRwiCs/nHb8/zKdlnDSwt7/m326s28OU4gqwYT0ub58/qquXAJdNtuFKsAI+x yu/SULdUbzFRwULB6ihTPopZpUja4g+SpmikbcHrLawZUHvxCrRZZmAMxo5g77hlwqkB 30VJoTcTRY0qsa4jqTKO8QV0DQxu3jE6IH/6tZCM9IXIpwETusUIUGUKRCFeV/UvMg6D zxoaE715WCpqq41t51kWLFUh3UWXyeIQt+9w/S+mODRot4vuDg2UBU/KG0E8iXJL7Rgh 4pDQ== X-Received: by 10.112.73.41 with SMTP id i9mr20080682lbv.128.1451991016239; Tue, 05 Jan 2016 02:50:16 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Marbook-Pro (a91-153-41-24.elisa-laajakaista.fi. [91.153.41.24]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k189sm16144338lfd.12.2016.01.05.02.50.14 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Jan 2016 02:50:14 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <382F6941-F317-45E4-9C4F-3A7D71E7AC24@gmail.com> (Chad Brown's message of "Mon, 4 Jan 2016 18:00:59 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (darwin) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4010:c04::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197649 Archived-At: Hi Chad and Yamamoto. Chad Brown writes: >> On 04 Jan 2016, at 17:00, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu wrote: >>=20 >> I'd like to hear what others think. Do you want to have a restricted >> version of the Mac port in the mainline? Will you use it in >> preference to the full-feature version distributed separately (e.g., >> via another git repository)? > > Speaking for myself: I do not use any form of the Mac port, but > instead use the NS port (under Mac OSX), because I want to track > the mainline (or the release candidate when such exists). From > what I=E2=80=99ve seen, there are things in the Mac port that I would > like to have (e.g. with regards to select), but I forgo in order > to help (minimally) emacs development. > > Thanks, > ~Chad I'm in the same boat. I want to track the mainline and maybe get into Emacs development, but I'm missing many of the Mac port's excellent features, especially the improved integration with OS X. Even having a restricted version merged to mainline would make me happier. However, I hope that everything could be merged some time in the future, when we figure out a way to support the same features on Linux. I'm wondering what this merge would mean to the NS port? Is the NS port made obsolete by the Mac port? I think it would be less effort to maintain a single port for OS X. Best regards, Martin Yrj=C3=B6l=C3=A4