From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Robert Pluim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: emacs-27 60c84ad: ; * etc/TODO: Fix last change. Date: Thu, 05 Mar 2020 10:48:02 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20200229173124.11831.98476@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20200229173125.E2D3A21167@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <83zhczxa2t.fsf@gnu.org> <83eeuay0ch.fsf@gnu.org> <83d09txw29.fsf@gnu.org> <83lfogw1gn.fsf@gnu.org> <83eeu8vy0e.fsf@gnu.org> <83v9njutez.fsf@gnu.org> <83tv33uop0.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="87859"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 05 10:49:05 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1j9n7n-000Mgn-Ln for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 10:49:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45918 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j9n7m-0008Ri-No for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 04:49:02 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35878) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j9n6s-0007Op-Dj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 04:48:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j9n6r-0005Ja-HX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 04:48:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::429]:35210) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j9n6r-0005JB-Bk; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 04:48:05 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id r7so6168678wro.2; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 01:48:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Hz0ePy7jqsXxCTGoIucRPDb94eSjkB3Y9BQQZ/+ss5s=; b=uxpCIg5aYkbkW+UYQ2X5mjx5FqvwnN0KfeEne53qHsbQ+4x/3rGXJgMGk4jHNd322H nIWcJ2ur/3Y4+l1384xB4mdIWldvjGLoJcnptAiXw+UDUVCA/iZsQYcb9kBX7+hKeOuo rpVTKHYVQ1BjHRdzFGrhjHqdrJDH7HdeP8YSdf233fvYFfz1SaJ/aTV8M+6EVm1C7v4E atQ/ULlV258KzsZtda9Rv9/ogM2lfmv98M/44vKDIDw1cZq3ZFPwjsf26IT2+pFa3MGn 1dp0zfl3rQSYtI9hSO8muNTCUFXM0EsNjp/Rg2uyk7jN9vBDyOHFpWkIji0rM57KHOhm HeCw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Hz0ePy7jqsXxCTGoIucRPDb94eSjkB3Y9BQQZ/+ss5s=; b=mdp3IxGb2oITsrl1v0SNr7DqlDUSaMDPlz0hzaJ6M9UTmrmWuJ/cPNlP/HfGaP+Yqr NSv5UA1yU6lwPLX49cVL73xoj09fNaA2S+z57dk+9krIRKR8Q/rfS3THN0kxgWzrOhB/ m5Xh+UF36Imr/0rtx/MtLF54Axt9S7g2gyNdZSmaU9cXqH/hiVNhxWx+l3m7Zu26hpe9 WaANDMdFaH/zBqV7KMyk1jyQWMOq22bbP+BqaR+057gYUcAD+JqO7yf+QujYZWmtnzP8 JLGTpHcEZ+P2KD3qY/NgHRTaYKwlC2+s+5H6IuiCTCigbGv+Vm4FbkJ/cD47Oo6OxBcs y5Jg== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2yuXUrPxSiLveFfQGvZWsbP7UDZ/Qpi9cAes4+ExRhzsE8WFSE zpwlpmxIbVVm/4Nv3WBMxmKHv1wJ X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvB6KG+22WWdosgowNLdv3q/mOPEQ2BPBKOyEzBAVm2Cl6WXSsJjtiR/U9PfqPqd24CsEh8nQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4c52:: with SMTP id n18mr9753868wrt.403.1583401683751; Thu, 05 Mar 2020 01:48:03 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from rpluim-mac ([149.5.228.1]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id k66sm5886266wmf.0.2020.03.05.01.48.03 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 05 Mar 2020 01:48:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <83tv33uop0.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 05 Mar 2020 11:38:03 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:4864:20::429 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:245257 Archived-At: >>>>> On Thu, 05 Mar 2020 11:38:03 +0200, Eli Zaretskii said: Eli> So I see no problem here, and making this display by a non-default Eli> font would be a regression, IMO, since that font could have differ= ent Eli> height, be variable-pitch, etc. But isn=CA=BCt that the whole thing we=CA=BCre discussing here: displaying characters with the Emoji property with a prettier font than either the default font or Symbola? Robert