Re: Question about üarent-frame changes

["Gerd Möllmann" <gerd.moellmann@gmail.com>]

martin rudalics <rudalics@gmx.at> writes:

> If the application asks for it, we'd have to decide what to do.  Clone
> the child frame in some way, for example, so that while there are two
> physical child frames - one for F1 and one for F2 - the application sees
> only one.

Cloning won't be necessary, that's a thing I can say with certainty.
With what I have done today, reparenting a child will be allowed, but
not making a child a root or the other way 'round, for reasons of
laziness if you will.

And I got a redisplay problem when popping up a backtrace buffer on a
child frame for some reason. Hm, new list entry.