From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Helmut Eller Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: e and pi Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:26:34 +0200 Message-ID: References: <8739t9xpt2.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <874odoweqm.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <83hbhnz7z2.fsf@gnu.org> <83bp7vz4w5.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1284809218 31549 80.91.229.12 (18 Sep 2010 11:26:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 11:26:58 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 18 13:26:57 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwvZI-0003DP-ER for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:26:56 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:58416 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OwvZH-00057U-KR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:26:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=58958 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1OwvZA-00056k-QI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:26:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwvZ9-000109-Ok for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:26:48 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:39312) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwvZ9-0000zm-Ir for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 07:26:47 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1OwvZ6-000374-Dl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:26:44 +0200 Original-Received: from dial-181118.pool.broadband44.net ([212.46.181.118]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:26:44 +0200 Original-Received: from eller.helmut by dial-181118.pool.broadband44.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 18 Sep 2010 13:26:44 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: dial-181118.pool.broadband44.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ibj7DfcsQb3eY6quVpXyFEB+jwg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:130394 Archived-At: * Eli Zaretskii [2010-09-18 11:07] writes: >> From: Helmut Eller >> Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2010 12:21:02 +0200 >> >> > What you describe as a big surprise is actually known to every C/C++ >> > programmer: some names are "reserved by the implementation" and should >> > not be used by the application code. >> >> I don't see how that could be relevant here. > > It's relevant because such limitations are common in other languages. No it's not relevant, because languages without dynamic scoping or wich support namespaces don't have this limitation. Helmut