From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Why post-command-hook so difficult to debug? Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:41:14 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87y5l5sbcq.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> <87r4qwddku.fsf@thinkpad.tsdh.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1345790493 5834 80.91.229.3 (24 Aug 2012 06:41:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 06:41:33 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 24 08:41:34 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T4naH-0003Kw-5I for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:41:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46423 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4naF-0004qO-HF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:41:31 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60557) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4naD-0004qF-NG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:41:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4naC-0005HY-OG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:41:29 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43586) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1T4naC-0005HN-C8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 02:41:28 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1T4na9-00038J-96 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:41:25 +0200 Original-Received: from 124.248.202.119 ([124.248.202.119]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:41:25 +0200 Original-Received: from sdl.web by 124.248.202.119 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 24 Aug 2012 08:41:25 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 9 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 124.248.202.119 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (OS X 10.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:sCbdYhG2e/QGNQjeLjbzzCt3vfo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:152788 Archived-At: On 2012-08-24 14:11 +0800, Tassilo Horn wrote: > I tried removing `tags-completion-at-point-function' from > `completion-at-point-functions' but the error persists. So it seems I'm > the culprit although I cannot spot the problem... Are you sure that nrepl-send-string-sync returns all completions in strings? Leo