From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Gerd_M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dumping unexec Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 17:10:46 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87il0dqrp7.fsf@gmail.com> <86v84d9rs5.fsf@gnu.org> <87bk64imly.fsf@yahoo.com> <87zftogkla.fsf@yahoo.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23598"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii , rpluim@gmail.com, schwab@suse.de, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Po Lu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 20 17:11:25 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ryCNB-00060i-6C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 17:11:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ryCMo-0001oR-VU; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 11:11:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ryCMh-0001n8-BK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 11:10:55 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-x52d.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52d]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ryCMf-00067f-CZ; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 11:10:55 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-x52d.google.com with SMTP id 4fb4d7f45d1cf-571cca01d8aso1654788a12.2; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 08:10:50 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1713625848; x=1714230648; darn=gnu.org; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=p+wJoqxYJdTl8nDQx3HRDpN/vgeNhg29Jc4WsqnrKi4=; b=QIwJmQdjvmGo5JO9wPmyO3MNsql/TDyW7o+Kk6TLQwTYkx+NeaHBchb5+FwaR/lonJ x/PWzP3vWzp5m5BIEtGuuI1b0V86FltrsQRlM+X+JSbOLWToiZSl5+ZPfkGbZy5sADAm zVz2OfWwr2/XfBdm4YM/75uBEjKmub285WZe75qSXkC9p+fLZyuYkfP8z4Z3ImszEUG+ Vpfi3Ax8vDlxVFKXpTSKdXsFiQ557v5oWJGKPPN4uklQodueshzs5JrIT9F6otpdEGIc 4lCgMHUHB0M46VyuZThWh6/gvvnY0eVeTOWh6G+fHO67+OQlOw8a9yBKuDM6WX8y1W3F duKw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1713625848; x=1714230648; h=mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date:references:in-reply-to :subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=p+wJoqxYJdTl8nDQx3HRDpN/vgeNhg29Jc4WsqnrKi4=; b=sYvh2x7MgmU5xXQRwpr+E15GdXrjlAEZlV8cIup4lDrNtGeONm1RWwe6ou80Ut9J38 r+vEuw5DvQuPQPJjFBmIV7uGAnQ0davJTaasclltBqecerwaBXA9Id//yKHFNYdpRWns qoF51/4eVYFkJ1s2dT3LEfIwEsx+3NN6eqAuAbcInOOn0Hx94rLMPh7MnpOg1phy/Bhl NKuPgSr47Rpc3AQYU4Ct1fKqYAEgouFST48XG+4RmXaNI5ad53hnqvBbo3KuowwtRCBj 3x+bEcN2ILYCWJdeZZ9SPurLe7QuKUgLW4Nnomy2Dp40BNl1P6PthcOfaCgD7QPpyyfK vGBA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCXkDUTBCZETx5gVqCOt3pMilaahZLr6OHGm6vpTigXOwgkEIko+KUxuLMcLoYFyfbpPqKbkeNVK3jAf56AS1gT737gVODuN6cI+gc3+OerbJYM= X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwMRDZhlG2rWUo9vY/y9uUHytiVXyrVXDOq7z5a/CjoMxOH1RIt +wF+lCa7CdmFXPNZsUdIPx/guAyqeweNdyyRLRF5c+V7sYgr8jFPQrVo0R1m X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGfdRAxQw4E9tLaMoPmNiY6K+ipLMeL1V2OI8iU0m2ALTV0jgnb2XWZhMbG6Km4iocI6dS4FQ== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:2789:b0:571:d648:ec18 with SMTP id b9-20020a056402278900b00571d648ec18mr3210615ede.29.1713625847849; Sat, 20 Apr 2024 08:10:47 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from Pro.fritz.box (p4fe3a59d.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [79.227.165.157]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id q29-20020a50cc9d000000b0056ff4faa0b9sm3589455edi.6.2024.04.20.08.10.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 20 Apr 2024 08:10:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87zftogkla.fsf@yahoo.com> (Po Lu's message of "Sat, 20 Apr 2024 22:44:17 +0800") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52d; envelope-from=gerd.moellmann@gmail.com; helo=mail-ed1-x52d.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:317882 Archived-At: Po Lu writes: > On my last attempt I failed to extract anything approaching an > intelligible backtrace from GDB. However, none of these systems are to > receive support for the MPS, so why has it suddenly become an issue of > immediate importance that unexec be given the axe? I think it just came up, and is unrelated to MPS.