From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sascha Wilde Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Building Emacs on SGI mips/netbsd Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:01:26 +0200 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1246003307 32642 80.91.229.12 (26 Jun 2009 08:01:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:01:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 26 10:01:40 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MK6NN-0003Ry-Qb for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:01:38 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:51736 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MK6NM-00009N-Vf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:01:36 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MK6NI-00009I-RJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:01:32 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MK6NI-000096-4i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:01:32 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=43310 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MK6NI-000093-2H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:01:32 -0400 Original-Received: from mail2.sha-bang.de ([78.47.120.114]:2741 helo=mail.sha-bang.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MK6ND-0006Bm-68; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 04:01:27 -0400 Original-Received: from kenny.sha-bang.local (xdslu153.osnanet.de [82.149.184.153]) by mail.sha-bang.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 828AA565; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:01:26 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from wilde by kenny.sha-bang.local with local (Sha Bang MUA v.0711184.68) ID 1MK6NC-00020f-2n; Fri, 26 Jun 2009 10:01:26 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Wed, 24 Jun 2009 14:03:58 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:111740 Archived-At: Glenn Morris wrote: > Sascha Wilde wrote: > >> + mips-*-netbsd* | mipseb-*-netbsd* \ >> + | mips64-*-netbsd* | mips64eb-*-netbsd* ) >> + machine=mips ;; >> + > > In Emacs 22, mips-*-netbsd*, mipsel-*-netbsd* and mipseb-*-netbsd* > used "machine=pmax". As far as I can tell, mips64* was not supported. > > The file src/m/pmax.h has since been deleted. It does seem quite > important to me to fix this, but I could not say if mips.h is "good > enough" or if pmax.h should be restored. Well, from my current experience I would say mips.h is good enough at least for non-mips64 R4000 systems (and afaik there is no mips64 netbsd at the moment). I don't have anything else to test, so people with different hardware or more theoretical knowledge should probably verify this. But I'd suggest to re-enable mips/netbsd support asap, so that it can get some wider testing. cheers sascha -- Sascha Wilde "Structure is _nothing_ if it is all you got. Skeletons _spook_ people if thwy try to walk around on their own. I really wonder why XML does not." -- Erik Naggum in comp.lang.lisp