From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ediff maximum line length? Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:01:18 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1297461698 7087 80.91.229.12 (11 Feb 2011 22:01:38 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2011 22:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Giorgos Keramidas Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Feb 11 23:01:31 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Po13R-0004hk-Po for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:01:29 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50670 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Po13Q-0000q9-Va for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:01:28 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39699 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Po13L-0000pS-O4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:01:24 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Po13K-0007n6-9V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:01:23 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:45837) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Po13K-0007mZ-1W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 17:01:22 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend1.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.180]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D98B1C01F28; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:01:19 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.8.164]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C5861C00085; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:01:19 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.180]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.8.164]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id sPJhdod4Wlze; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:01:18 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-123-171.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.123.171]) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTP; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:01:18 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 501) id 2971CCA2A0; Fri, 11 Feb 2011 23:01:18 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: ...Um...Um... In-Reply-To: (Giorgos Keramidas's message of "Fri, 11 Feb 2011 13:45:11 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2.93 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 212.18.0.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:135916 Archived-At: Giorgos Keramidas writes: > On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:27:26 -0500, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> diff-mode is not a replacement for ediff in that it only helps you read >> contextual diffs (i.e. the output of `diff' or other tools that output >> in the same format). >> So, if you do >> >> exec emacs --eval "(diff \"$1\" \"$2\")" >> >> the resulting *diff* buffer will be in diff-mode. > > Without fine diff highlighting though. Anything wrong with diff-refine-hunk? Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."