From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: CHENG Gao Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [ELPA] New package: loccur Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 13:57:18 +0800 Organization: Royau.Me Message-ID: References: <87bn978wcz.fsf@mbork.pl> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1451541488 32668 80.91.229.3 (31 Dec 2015 05:58:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2015 05:58:08 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 31 06:57:54 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aEWFF-0003cV-QO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 06:57:53 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54747 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aEWFF-0003ax-6i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:57:53 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44815) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aEWEu-0003TY-Mt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:57:36 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aEWEq-0008DE-Km for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:57:32 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52354) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aEWEq-0008D8-Ea for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 00:57:28 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1aEWEo-0003Is-6B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 06:57:26 +0100 Original-Received: from 112.80.138.165 ([112.80.138.165]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 06:57:26 +0100 Original-Received: from chenggao by 112.80.138.165 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 31 Dec 2015 06:57:26 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 21 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 112.80.138.165 User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (darwin) Cancel-Lock: sha1:pQNLpChRRxjEZYCh1TvRRu55aCQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:197228 Archived-At: *On Wed, 30 Dec 2015 13:29:24 -0800 * Also sprach John Wiegley : >>>>>> Marcin Borkowski writes: > >> Any reason to go into Elpa and not core, btw? > > Packages which core does not depend on go into ELPA. More things will > go into ELPA in future, so we're starting that trend now. I like this trend. Just a little curious about definition of "core". It means files under lisp/emacs-lisp/ and lisp/? Grep shows several under lisp/emacs-lisp/ and many under lisp/ do (featurep 'xemacs) check. Are they necessary still? I understand standalone packages supporting both Emacs and Xemacs need this, but these files I wonder. And that'll be good if files under lisp/ be categorized under subdirs suck as core/, util/ etc. Just my wish.