From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Wiegley Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] comment-cache 223d16f 2/3: Apply `comment-depth' text properties when calling `back_comment'. Date: Wed, 09 Mar 2016 12:53:14 -0800 Message-ID: References: <20160308132530.861.91488@vcs.savannah.gnu.org> <20160308183010.GB6269@acm.fritz.box> <20160309174816.GE3948@acm.fritz.box> <56E0805F.3050804@gmx.at> <8360wvo0bn.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: John Wiegley NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1457556848 29911 80.91.229.3 (9 Mar 2016 20:54:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 20:54:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: martin rudalics , emacs-devel@gnu.org, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, acm@muc.de To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 09 21:53:51 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1adl76-00054E-0q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 21:53:48 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44440 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adl72-0001aD-1d for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:53:44 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52169) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adl6n-0001a3-EB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:53:30 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adl6m-0002zS-I5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:53:29 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pf0-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d]:34031) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1adl6i-0002yq-LM; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 15:53:24 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pf0-x22d.google.com with SMTP id 129so49988861pfw.1; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 12:53:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:references :user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=6XPaencmbxHuFD5b3LELrx5tU5Cmt6Ip7fDNDBWGGgc=; b=E/AqjBrjBvH+RdUYYSK5xl8E32qggwJgyFUjkJXRnsaI/Hcp7YKEgSuj8LQI+UhDR0 1sRfdgciufhL2ARlYhg6ZEbBS6OvEuGQeHcux4G/C5lSfAB0iGvyOqUpy0Q/PQK4jEzi bEEudGmBML/aTG1iNyZtl7mXtiDshleYa8fgik734gh0Ji+99X3HzMrhuL2nmfrIEGyG Yru1XbjqcTwpjyvLu2xGnBrmh4yomaDwa37wNXwgwVGukYbdIB5JugaFAehRpjcmmgcL HYpHTswpYefujOYxWJnDSFgCvLrQ6d98LSgPsXuKbbj0C+qaGtGpDrovBBVy+YSxeKCQ pwgA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :references:user-agent:reply-to:mail-followup-to:mime-version; bh=6XPaencmbxHuFD5b3LELrx5tU5Cmt6Ip7fDNDBWGGgc=; b=DMkdFepXU9ToVSK5nersb6StaVAwh8CR4cB3BhsEm3CmrCRz2SYK83+D63a050bRWw Tof4scEEdOAYo9ZDWRUum4eXsnXV1dXRARWpaS9h2ccQCwwmVbBR9wU7vf+2jGuJHVtp FHiEpaoDxKxmYczVZfFmBH/UpiWzxO8N2AigC63jb0kujrnMo8TsehIC34tjoGP0AwS7 AO2Hwl5859ZGW15QVkj0T9w6jKEiti3vrbYaJWCb7aKCkO032BEDPTRU7rv8qQ5MtuOU 06My9y2SVYkAg8xuJZK6DldaGDa2fOm1axgV8YzK/hyQMOFeDcvBz/RcQ0OrqN3BTSfz 0QvA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJLkgO1TfJ0zS2I/oEL2usz8ZguIVoTL+zQMu43MDB+ITtzC64luyI9t7Ua6Pt9rlQ== X-Received: by 10.98.86.157 with SMTP id h29mr366470pfj.105.1457556803863; Wed, 09 Mar 2016 12:53:23 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from Vulcan.local (76-234-68-79.lightspeed.frokca.sbcglobal.net. [76.234.68.79]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r68sm274673pfb.51.2016.03.09.12.53.22 (version=TLS1 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 09 Mar 2016 12:53:22 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Original-From: "John Wiegley" Original-Received: by Vulcan.local (Postfix, from userid 501) id 9CE3313620C16; Wed, 9 Mar 2016 12:53:21 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <8360wvo0bn.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 09 Mar 2016 22:36:44 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.92 (darwin) Mail-Followup-To: Eli Zaretskii , martin rudalics , acm@muc.de, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca, emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:201321 Archived-At: >>>>> Eli Zaretskii writes: > I concur that the current C mode is much slower than it was several releases > ago. My personal subjective impression is that it gets slower with every new > release, and I suspect that the main reason is our desire to support more > and more C quirks and subtleties. If this is true, I'd be glad to go back to > a simpler C mode, which sometimes mis-fontified or even (gasp!) mis-indented > an occasional rare construct, but to get back the speed we enjoyed in the > past. I entirely agree, Eli. -- John Wiegley GPG fingerprint = 4710 CF98 AF9B 327B B80F http://newartisans.com 60E1 46C4 BD1A 7AC1 4BA2