From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Gerd_M=C3=B6llmann?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: scratch/tty-child-frames f62d70f52f4: Don't pause display for pending input Date: Sat, 16 Nov 2024 13:50:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <86mshzgzrz.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="4668"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Nov 16 13:51:43 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tCIH9-00014N-1O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 13:51:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tCIGK-00062i-7v; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:50:52 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tCIGH-00062Y-A8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:50:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-wm1-x32c.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::32c]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tCIGE-0002hE-FS; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 07:50:47 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-wm1-x32c.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-4316cce103dso7378395e9.3; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:50:45 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1731761444; x=1732366244; darn=gnu.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=wPhTwRGidB/yJAQ5/ILcJraVFwinGxxx34f75xKImdk=; b=UfC/9lavVBDftO39X+2ueXz4NObA8kbqtPA2HLRtehuWOfVhOqeZ9tx1XMqOCwYR+g rfP/odgr0V5xe/yI7cHKdlDlKCQfMo5GC8AZGiNP3CL7keIieFqb1bWCrMSiTo+0Nono g7T57UIZJeBbAcu/ZcW/0a7TsjZC0Jy3E4qlgiAtz0C85jxecRUZ+LOS6f8tZUBhrDHT fJz9jxKhA1o7deKbDN4rETnayKCiETXTpc81wtbZ3vN99noXgWMFx+SlU4UYN6sPrFZO 9ha1Gq5zDoAW9x5GAWo63V5DiA6knEU+nXUwAekYyU/QuWWgfPf3ajn9bmQ9Z2wAkQ2d rFAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1731761444; x=1732366244; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=wPhTwRGidB/yJAQ5/ILcJraVFwinGxxx34f75xKImdk=; b=wH5+Up/l+xNwfJWuX6e+/XsFITcxML3ZceUY4D9d6dUuNUFwdriAVGKCPKeBOWrIvB PSP2nEGwmQhASaZtL3F31/FwSaRMakdOfHEPnshflpm+mTZbpUJan4jv03kTJ3SwsDJ5 K/E9MtRwTHU7Gk++pf5l1HlswxCl77nScQeYhSZQPGVtAgGMhVR6qEk4HvSIEmYMCqu5 p+dIiPUmiIBYG/taHpNHIoCkbTwoFVDHBDrHykOpL6kp7RSi6mLinnQ06DmrNYYPKYQj CQLYxrWzfPIkuhGNu/MXcQQKJ1ImgFqN+Fkv39avHpq86Q7nVqqLMISJkqErn4pxlCLN iUGg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwcwKainawEg8BBhz44G73O1PJcIZZPFN81Splx7EhgRXs8DXxz aKGrKJ+C9+LK+N4wMwUowQJ3nhbAAnXrascE74aOagnh0KD8SoBMV6QGTg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IHz5n87PpRYKN7x7Z82roHIe98pLfc5IGFGevFIRmm6Qn82d7QWPq6PYZQguLnYYx1k1cYe+A== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:4e0f:b0:42a:a6b8:f09f with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-432df78f3aamr52904585e9.23.1731761444032; Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:50:44 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from pro2 (pd9e36998.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [217.227.105.152]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-432dab806e1sm89453525e9.20.2024.11.16.04.50.43 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 16 Nov 2024 04:50:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <86mshzgzrz.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 16 Nov 2024 13:54:08 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::32c; envelope-from=gerd.moellmann@gmail.com; helo=mail-wm1-x32c.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325476 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> branch: scratch/tty-child-frames >> commit f62d70f52f4f6b7ed158d618bf790df21f171172 >> Author: Gerd M=C3=B6llmann >> Commit: Gerd M=C3=B6llmann >>=20 >> Don't pause display for pending input >>=20=20=20=20=20 >> * src/dispnew.c: Remove display_completed, redisplay_dont_pause, >> redisplay-dont-pause was declared obsolete in Emacs 24. Remove anyt= hing >> checking pending input, change function signatures accordingly, and = so >> on. >>=20=20=20=20=20 >> * src/keyboard.c (read_char): Don't use redisplay_dont_pause. >> * src/minibuf.c (read_minibuf): Use new function signatures. >> * src/xdisp.c: Don't check display_completed. Use new API. >>=20=20=20=20=20 >> * lisp/subr.el (redisplay-dont-pause): Remove declaration. > > I don't think this kind of change is appropriate. Feature branches > should not add/remove features not directly related to the feature > being developed on the branch. If we want to remove > redisplay-dont-pause from Emacs (and I'm not yet sure we do), it > should be discussed on emacs-devel or in a dedicated bug report, not > silently installed on the branch. The variable redisplay-dont-pause is declared obsolete since 24.3 or so. I wouldn't have expected that removing requires yet another discussion. > > So I think this changeset should be reverted from the branch. If you > found that this variable somehow adversely affects child frames on > tty, let's discuss what you found and the possible solutions. > > Thanks. I'll revert that on savannah, but I must add that I don't have the energy/resources to do complicated ports of stuff from my fork to GNU, and that's making things definitely more complicated.