From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ido-vc-dir anyone? Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 18:19:02 +0800 Message-ID: References: <4E56700B.9010108@dogan.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1314353970 11141 80.91.229.12 (26 Aug 2011 10:19:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 26 Aug 2011 10:19:30 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 26 12:19:27 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QwtVW-0006vg-Qp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:19:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41282 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwtVQ-00077W-VO for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 06:19:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:37109) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwtVN-00077J-M6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 06:19:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwtVM-0004BO-Tt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 06:19:17 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:47864) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QwtVM-0004BF-Ku for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 06:19:16 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QwtVL-0006rD-6X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:19:15 +0200 Original-Received: from 58.22.113.140 ([58.22.113.140]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:19:15 +0200 Original-Received: from sdl.web by 58.22.113.140 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 26 Aug 2011 12:19:15 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 58.22.113.140 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUzRVhbQj4eZqO6SjnT eWpxnMetm5b6/PmidmqrAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1F B9cBBwMLBfKABCMAAAFoSURBVCjPtZI9a8MwEIaFoc7aYDdelQMna0Em3tsSr0XUeE2Q6a22a+v+ fk8fSSBkbDUI6dHpfe9OEvRgiD+ApqKPJgJeB6iUUXWESjUe/ig38AJrhqqvaU2nTIXbNvOQ40fe qdry4kyGoVWsfCQalXpHnJGM01wjWdYbMlXNFdsZDO69m9aqNqxEJqTEgbM5OF7wlEfIoll1Ked4 LbM5X2EdILLokEdmI8z7g5cKED0cuTC930TYhy7ZDekkXVGw/L60TguJePPxcJF48lpsSUWEA/Ju jGFNgJOXc4Hz7TmAdBeu5Ve4AEjOi2/2jfd3cAJZ+IbNrvdjgBZY01b+HTuG3cLws6BJZqVOj/pp T0OqVwx3rFq+QmJwx3loK5JSLEhDIt62+mtC2C+SrAUxEbV6C6v2BRbd6pILBKFpepKZJHgGgrKF sptSUUoczpwg2pQ7ZH1tgs0ou/917mzz6Cs2//C978cv5l07L02orIEAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3.50 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:se5Z/NGumwnUC/cynoURGMWPtYk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143587 Archived-At: On 2011-08-25 23:53 +0800, Deniz Dogan wrote: > Attached is a patch suggestion which implements `ido-vc-dir' which is > an ido replacement for `vc-dir'. There is some code duplication > (copied straight from the definition of `vc-dir'), which we probably > don't want. > > What do you think? Why do we need this? I just tried vc-dir and when ido-mode is used, it is already very convenient to use. Leo