From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Theodor Thornhill Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Gitlab Migration Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2021 23:17:32 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87h7fcnmq0.fsf@posteo.net> <83tujbqg4j.fsf@gnu.org> <46353190-1190-495f-b15e-22980159b3ab@yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23277"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: philipk@posteo.net, Daniel Fleischer , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Dmitry Gutov , Stefan Monnier , Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 27 23:19:11 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mJjFm-0005iV-GQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 23:19:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53404 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJjFl-0006ly-Fv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:19:09 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:32942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJjEM-0005Zu-JU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:17:43 -0400 Original-Received: from out1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:863f::]:15066) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mJjEJ-0002Pn-Rj; Fri, 27 Aug 2021 17:17:42 -0400 X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=thornhill.no; s=key1; t=1630099054; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=9Q6udyERlbyjhIWDkgsBfjKAyfxtCWjSfQpyZ5TIWpQ=; b=WHWhDWiCaMDRHXZ+Vm13+YfOOoxiBVEYGTZiHvnl/pqH3IecUvy1fMRaJ/l6EL4hkgnJvt qhDpFQMkdmKCrHa9r7vFpqfSbgaQSyTJwTB1gEbvC6MxSps+TIVkYU7MArGasYeORIaO4M nJUbqxWGNASZn5SCAg22kXbjA2CqAz69NrZdOPlAJNIDVqdmRtUUhBGX4pCAQUnAiQ4jgi cNvshan3+D8tqMuxhysplicrhPI5N98k0QtJ1donu67r4VWGSOBIzErWuA6slEiqjFRenn JZuCnyEbRZhgzpwerBpUkQCOQRVrsDJgznEPdQIgvSd2kAwMiQWbPbwFzK0lAw== In-Reply-To: <46353190-1190-495f-b15e-22980159b3ab@yandex.ru> X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT X-Migadu-Auth-User: theo@thornhill.no Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:41d0:2:863f::; envelope-from=theo@thornhill.no; helo=out1.migadu.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:273186 Archived-At: Dmitry Gutov writes: > On 27.08.2021 17:33, Stefan Monnier wrote: >>> Agreed. We don't need to force everyone to use a single workflow. >>> We should have a platform that supports reasonably well the different >>> popular workflows. >> >> AFAIK SourceHut is the only project which explicitly aims to provide >> full and convenient support for both web and email control, which makes >> it the obvious&natural choice for Emacs, IMO. > > From what I have seen of it, it's email-first, and far from "full and > convenient support for ... web". > > For example, those quality-of-life features that Gitlab has in the > browser which I previously figured would be difficult to translate to > email (the code review workflow, with inline comments and updates from > the branch; automatically updated CI indicators and links to builds; > editing of messages) are predictably absent. This isn't really true though. There definitely are links to builds and inline comments. Though I agree on parts of this. One missing thing as I see it is the updated patch. You need to find the latest patches, and it won't update as in GitHub when you add another "oops" commit. > > Of course, it should still be a significant step forward compared to the > current situation. Yeah. One might also think that some contributions could trickle down to sourcehut itself when emacs workflow settles, so the "github way" of contributing could get a little love? Theo