From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rudolf Schlatte Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please, Restore Previous Behavior for jump-to-register Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 11:14:40 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87h6kr9817.fsf@posteo.net> <87a5qi1vui.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="25792"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:x9o+RzNAEd37aL63n1QFE/g3Ew0= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 10 11:36:58 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rCHBA-0006XT-SR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 11:36:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rCHAo-0005Xf-0d; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 05:36:34 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rCGrE-0002jM-QF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 05:16:20 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rCGrD-0000tL-0m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 05:16:20 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1rCGrB-0001LN-2F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2023 11:16:17 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sun, 10 Dec 2023 05:36:32 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:313667 Archived-At: Thierry Volpiatto writes: > Eduardo Ochs writes: > >> On Sat, 9 Dec 2023 at 03:58, Thierry Volpiatto wrote: >>> >>> You can now have the previous behavior by customizing >>> `register-use-preview`. >>> >>> It will be soon visible in NEWS and INFO. >> >> Hi Thierry, >> >> AFAICS a part of the problem still remains... >> Try this in an emacs30 -q: >> >> (setq register-use-preview 'never) >> C-x r SPC a >> C-x r SPC a >> >> The second `C-x r SPC a' says "[Overwrite register `a']" and asks for >> a RET to confirm. > > This is the wanted behavior when you are about to overwrite a register. Adding my voice to the choir here to say that I would very much like the current behavior to stay (either by default or as an option I can set). Having `point-to-register' sometimes ask for confirmation and sometimes not would be even more disruptive to me, so the `'never' option as described above would not help me.