From: Sam Steingold <sds@gnu.org>
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: lldb support
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 14:01:25 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <m1wpg9et8a.fsf@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: E1c50bi-0003OQ-6b@fencepost.gnu.org
> * Richard Stallman <ezf@tah.bet> [2016-11-10 20:26:18 -0500]:
>
> > All the usual reasons people prefer tool A over tool B:
> > compatibility with a specific environment, personal
> > customizations, familiarity, and personal preference. LLDB is free
> > software. We should support it.
>
> Your argument disregards the important fact that LLDB is part
> of a project that aims to replace many important GNU packages,
> and its success is the GNU Project's loss.
What is wrong with replacing a GNU package with a non-GNU
package which is free software?
How is it a loss for GNU?
It seems that if there is a better free debugger than gdb, GNU can
switch the resources currently devoted to gdb to another project.
--
Sam Steingold (http://sds.podval.org/) on darwin Ns 10.3.1504
http://steingoldpsychology.com http://www.childpsy.net http://mideasttruth.com
http://think-israel.org http://thereligionofpeace.com https://jihadwatch.org
Linux: Telling Microsoft where to go since 1991.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-11-11 19:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-11-07 20:05 lldb support Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-07 20:20 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-08 3:08 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-08 13:19 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-08 19:58 ` John Wiegley
2016-11-09 0:54 ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-09 1:17 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-09 3:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-10 0:24 ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-10 0:26 ` Daniel Colascione
2016-11-11 1:26 ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-11 4:24 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-11 4:46 ` Nikolaus Rath
2016-11-12 0:42 ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-11 9:44 ` Philippe Vaucher
2016-11-11 17:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-11-11 17:42 ` Stefan Huchler
2016-11-11 17:47 ` John Wiegley
2016-11-12 0:59 ` Stefan Huchler
2016-11-12 22:30 ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-14 21:58 ` John Wiegley
2016-11-16 4:13 ` Joseph Mingrone
2016-11-16 14:27 ` Stefan Monnier
2016-12-25 20:43 ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-11 19:01 ` Sam Steingold [this message]
2016-11-12 1:02 ` Stefan Huchler
2016-11-12 22:25 ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-12 0:54 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-12 22:30 ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-10 1:51 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-10 1:57 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-10 3:43 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-10 9:33 ` Toon Claes
2016-11-10 15:57 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-10 16:27 ` Toon Claes
2016-11-10 17:19 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-12 7:04 ` Toon Claes
2016-11-12 7:47 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-01-04 21:35 ` Toon Claes
2016-11-10 13:58 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-10 16:02 ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-11-09 1:37 ` John Wiegley
2016-11-09 3:06 ` Perry E. Metzger
2016-11-10 0:23 ` Richard Stallman
2016-11-10 1:18 ` John Mastro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=m1wpg9et8a.fsf@gnu.org \
--to=sds@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).