From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: minibuffer-eldef Date: 01 Jun 2004 23:25:55 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040528.182035.197345599.wl@gnu.org> <87k6yvorzf.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <20040529213132.GA31322@fencepost> <873c5hd35q.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <8765aadbgb.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1086146894 17035 80.91.224.253 (2 Jun 2004 03:28:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2004 03:28:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juri Linkov , wl@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 02 05:28:04 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BVMQ8-0003RM-00 for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 05:28:04 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BVMQ8-0004i7-00 for ; Wed, 02 Jun 2004 05:28:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BVMQO-0001MZ-I3 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 23:28:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BVMQL-0001KL-Mc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 23:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BVMQK-0001IS-4u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 23:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BVMQK-0001IJ-2O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 23:28:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [206.47.199.166] (helo=simmts8-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BVMO8-0001t7-BT; Tue, 01 Jun 2004 23:26:00 -0400 Original-Received: from empanada.local ([67.70.165.15]) by simmts8-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040602032556.QSMD28088.simmts8-srv.bellnexxia.net@empanada.local>; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 23:25:56 -0400 Original-Received: by empanada.local (Postfix, from userid 502) id CF54A1DEF91; Tue, 1 Jun 2004 23:25:58 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Miles Bader In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 7 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:24384 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:24384 > I actually prefer the " [...]" syntax over "(default ...)" too[*], but I > think it's more important for Emacs to be consistent. We can be consistent by using [...] everywhere. Stefan