From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: list-system-processes on OpenBSD [was Re: emacs-24.2.93 build problems] Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 10:31:30 +0800 Message-ID: References: <513294CE.5060101@cs.ucla.edu> <87a9qi687k.fsf@moo.wxcvbn.org> <87obeyeykk.fsf@moo.wxcvbn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1362537107 22220 80.91.229.3 (6 Mar 2013 02:31:47 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Mar 2013 02:31:47 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Glenn Morris Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 06 03:32:11 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UD49L-0005LK-1g for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 03:32:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38536 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UD48y-0007MC-Po for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:31:48 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:41337) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UD48t-0007LY-OZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:31:44 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UD48s-00067N-KH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:31:43 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-da0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22c]:38501) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UD48s-00067F-DU; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 21:31:42 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-da0-f44.google.com with SMTP id z20so64552dae.17 for ; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:31:41 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=Q7vvCNqT6XMx7B1A4s5Y/x1b2m5gJnlemt0yiQY0Xc8=; b=N3+7fifLyhuNNOLrwQfNI7HnG6Vf6v2N0HzD/SyEB0AnfTGxJkMSOhfxuEYnBb/ntS CKZ54W7+ckZK2Mx7Bwu4XsVfSSo4MPsNlrFhK0TmZMUESc7UnOhPzEoKFUssSMJ+fBXe mE+93zHbmmC1vOal1YWCOn5HdF/Yh87O4GhLwBz4SYtvHjw5VgYscLI10qlDbmZwp3Ip xZ/X3UK+hbZblmRp7Y0LILtiQ8dDrM9fKzsojYHcJpqbBzD8TPNNr7XJqgrDFbbIYvE2 WH4V+SEyAOgYyg1FDVITNtOMmGwAUlQcmXv17xituqnzF5BiUn6moOxmjoQDkh4TsA4/ sx3w== X-Received: by 10.68.202.3 with SMTP id ke3mr41989785pbc.98.1362537101376; Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:31:41 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([182.48.109.29]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id iv3sm29119289pbc.40.2013.03.05.18.31.37 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Mar 2013 18:31:40 -0800 (PST) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACkAAAApAQAAAACAGz1bAAABKElEQVQYlWNg3NIt5FDPUPt7 4+X79Qyucz5/ugik+L2PBgKpyphaIK921q23QDnG0NBQoMr/vaWl9f8ZLL78uPv5PwN7RETfzXoG jhmFz27XM0RXmpuY/WfY+fv0Mc56BvFybfXA/wwL5t/wF61n2PU59axXPcOVzbmSW/8zrNt1benC /ww70hqUU/4zKCtrT9jwn8FhwynbufUMendE2aLqGRpdX9al1zM8eh17lKeeQcTMrdD5P8P3j/YT Q/8zXHSb7p1Qz/C4OM2JuZ7hgtI7K6AjqsMnf8j4z8C6xG1tw3+GqpqvsVn/GTzmpD9j/8/wP/oZ S/l/Bka+QO/g/wy15ueeFQL9N1O8mPU/g+umV3t1gdT0/1bTgHLqYVeXAlWKpMWt+w8Az82C9nHf X0cAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: (Glenn Morris's message of "Tue, 05 Mar 2013 12:24:45 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.8.2) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c00::22c X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:157542 Archived-At: On 2013-03-06 01:24 +0800, Glenn Morris wrote: >> But as far as 24.3 is concerned, I *really* suggest making this >> function a stub on OpenBSD (just returning Qnil). > > I'm inclined to agree with this. Any other opinions? > > Ref > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=11797 > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=5725 > http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=5243 Sounds like a good plan since it makes openbsd users happy. Leo