From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Rectangular regions Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2013 10:13:52 +0800 Message-ID: References: <52707D17.6010801@dancol.org> <8338niefba.fsf@gnu.org> <87a9hq8h7p.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1383272063 25676 80.91.229.3 (1 Nov 2013 02:14:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 02:14:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Bastien , Eli Zaretskii , dancol@dancol.org, Jay Finger , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 01 03:14:27 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vc4Fm-0000V4-G6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Nov 2013 03:14:26 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60040 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vc4Fm-0001rU-2a for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:14:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58775) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vc4Fb-0001r2-LX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:14:24 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vc4FT-0005x5-7r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:14:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pb0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c01::229]:60401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vc4FT-0005wx-0I; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 22:14:07 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pb0-f41.google.com with SMTP id wy17so453577pbc.28 for ; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:14:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=ZdVjtah423kazlZ+JPvVkjHWRcwuD4TN9OOYqnFtucM=; b=yxf+iJpWZ60d06JW2+4XEE/nkMIkKdMf86KeOi90PdaLY3wRmc78Bwv1l7GyY4D7SP CEuw0694U3XHg1drbAuShO3Q+RyY35uZn9QZZkVbLa+PZYcgAapylGBLI18dVHTG2a69 9ewwNObQlpVaX8t/OaVjuHncvn/AjWFfrG8kOTGGFNEB7U/6kRDz2nhd1eOjhb0hlBkI kY3oRIMXjtU08vgY6OwyqKjtSjOY1kCpAPV7YxZmygLuSpOtGdjcy9F3JYPwGv4/8HqM QOh9tmcNX2/72JEgkIBbv+A43R/2NFpCUzQoJ4NXsb5fl7i1KNowalKO0kxAlHHQ6/gi PYdw== X-Received: by 10.66.188.203 with SMTP id gc11mr712601pac.63.1383272045794; Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:14:05 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([123.119.81.79]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id wr10sm7270863pbc.17.2013.10.31.19.13.55 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 31 Oct 2013 19:14:04 -0700 (PDT) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAElBMVEUAAAAAAP+LRRP0pGC+ vr7///+7mT1iAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMO DhglKe4AAAEsSURBVCjPbZNBboQwDEV/Cd4X9QJRThApmn0XYW+Jyf2v0m+HhqDBgiAe9rcTG7QH w/1Vn2Ar8gBb/ocywSN3qK9T3z4eFDB4eApocBpeBs1RSykoJd8gQcm8pGmHXFso3ajnmsqV0TnY DQkOfXUfN5NwaI7AWTVOyEhcu1aHmdWItHddUVUcUgUBCkitu8V6ditHVOVdqzl2EQ1ZVGTbdK0V 7cqn8vWzoU5Q/bF9Y/Y0cRU1xwkys5dJ+Dt6pBDWifcNQml8Gh2JVmPSoQzo7en0grswkxrUGYJ7 0hSxxAGr7ZMwYcHIzprpi7TENEE1xtiYxixRlCfPBsUUrwHD7uGIwATrbnODJcVrPpVn3hxiGloe m/S+z3CtuzUSMo83N4DPH+F0evwR3P4A2k+75838OKQAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 31 Oct 2013 21:40:48 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.9) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c01::229 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:164772 Archived-At: On 2013-11-01 09:40 +0800, Stefan Monnier wrote: > So, I guess, in summary, this counts as an additional vote for C-x SPC. > It looks like GUD will have to adapt. > > > Stefan May I venture another proposal: C-]? Come to think about it one would (usually) have to move lines to use rectangle-mark? C-] C-n C-n ... seems quite natural to type. If I understand the difference between abort-recursive-edit and exit-recursive-edit correctly, the former exits to the top-level, which make sense as part of exit-recursive-edit but with C-u. Keys are precious resources and if there are ones we can GC, it is one stone for two birds. But I never use C-] for abort-recursive-edit. Comments? Leo