From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some findings and suggestion about Emacs on w32 Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:44:40 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <008d01c4b886$32d07ff0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <00d901c4b900$9b774500$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098657916 30995 80.91.229.6 (24 Oct 2004 22:45:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 22:45:16 +0000 (UTC) Cc: guy@wyrdrune.com, Lennart Borgman , Emacs Devel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 25 00:45:06 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CLr6o-0001XJ-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 00:45:06 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLrEQ-00019o-4e for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:52:58 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CLrEJ-00019e-2C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:52:51 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CLrEI-00019K-Dy for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:52:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLrEI-00019A-B0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:52:50 -0400 Original-Received: from [206.47.199.165] (helo=simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CLr6O-0003ak-J5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:44:40 -0400 Original-Received: from empanada.home ([67.71.35.140]) by simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20041024224439.HGVH1960.simmts7-srv.bellnexxia.net@empanada.home>; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:44:39 -0400 Original-Received: by empanada.home (Postfix, from userid 502) id 32043338F4A; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 18:44:40 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Mon, 25 Oct 2004 00:23:15 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28864 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28864 > There is a problem if you start the server in .emacs; does the first > or second instance run the server ? I don't know if there is a > generic answer to that question. The current code just overwrites any previous server, so the last instance is the one that wins. Stefan