From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [patch] enhanced mac drag-n-drop Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:59:00 -0400 Message-ID: References: <2dd8774c48ccbc9795d0d4ebe620f1e2@swipnet.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1113278417 1760 80.91.229.2 (12 Apr 2005 04:00:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 04:00:17 +0000 (UTC) Cc: sorourke@cs.ucsd.edu, jan.h.d@swipnet.se, mituharu@math.s.chiba-u.ac.jp, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 12 06:00:14 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLCYq-00067S-Rl for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 12 Apr 2005 05:59:37 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLC95-0003zT-T4 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:32:59 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DLC8X-0003lE-0k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:32:25 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DLC8Q-0003gz-V5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:32:21 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DLC8O-0003g6-RT for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:32:16 -0400 Original-Received: from [206.47.199.163] (helo=simmts5-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DLCYR-0006nO-4N; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:59:11 -0400 Original-Received: from empanada.home ([67.68.217.126]) by simmts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20050412035901.MOTS1614.simmts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@empanada.home>; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:59:01 -0400 Original-Received: by empanada.home (Postfix, from userid 502) id 128044EE859; Mon, 11 Apr 2005 23:59:01 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:58:58 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (darwin) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:35887 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:35887 > Indeed, it makes signal handling synchronous, i.e. more like > cooperative multithreading: if you forget to use QUIT at some spot, it > might lead to an Emacs process completely unresponsive to C-g. > Does this mean that immediate_quit stops working? Most likely. Just like it currently doesn't work if you're inside a BLOCK_INPUT section. Stefan