From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New Function vc-annotate-chosen-revision - PATCH Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:22:24 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <1094851783.9297.204131161@webmail.messagingengine.com> <1094928392.25856.204167151@webmail.messagingengine.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1094937779 25223 80.91.229.6 (11 Sep 2004 21:22:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2004 21:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs Devel List Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 11 23:22:49 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C6FKa-0003dN-00 for ; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 23:22:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6FQ2-0002UD-2V for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:28:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C6FPv-0002TK-7H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:28:19 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C6FPt-0002Sp-Lv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:28:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C6FPt-0002Sm-IU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:28:17 -0400 Original-Received: from [206.47.199.166] (helo=simmts8-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C6FKD-0000bO-Ut for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:22:26 -0400 Original-Received: from empanada.home ([67.71.119.105]) by simmts8-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20040911212047.HZQZ1692.simmts8-srv.bellnexxia.net@empanada.home>; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:20:47 -0400 Original-Received: by empanada.home (Postfix, from userid 502) id 09C7A2E3892; Sat, 11 Sep 2004 17:22:24 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: jbyler+emacs-lists@anon41.eml.cc In-Reply-To: <1094928392.25856.204167151@webmail.messagingengine.com> (jbyler's message of "Sat, 11 Sep 2004 14:46:32 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:27028 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:27028 >> But C-u C-x v g does basically just that, no? > Well, C-u C-x v g does a similar thing but in a different context: it > lets you annotate a chosen revision of the file in the current buffer. > My new function lets you annotate a chosen revision of the file > *annotated* in the current buffer. But C-u C-x v g does basically just that (except that it *also* works in non-annotated buffers, and it doesn't give the same default in the prompt, and it's bound to a different key), doesn't it? Stefan