From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Patch for more useful C-x } and C-x { behavior Date: Sat, 05 May 2012 11:21:00 +0800 Message-ID: References: <4FA48F92.2080706@dogan.se> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336188083 12213 80.91.229.3 (5 May 2012 03:21:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 03:21:23 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 05 05:21:21 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SQVYe-0004Ah-Tt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 05:21:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45480 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQVYe-0004UD-90 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 23:21:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:59032) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQVYa-0004Ta-KR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 23:21:17 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQVYY-0001g4-Vt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 23:21:16 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:52801) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SQVYY-0001fy-PP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 May 2012 23:21:14 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SQVYU-00043X-Vb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 05 May 2012 05:21:10 +0200 Original-Received: from 123.114.40.18 ([123.114.40.18]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 May 2012 05:21:10 +0200 Original-Received: from sdl.web by 123.114.40.18 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 05 May 2012 05:21:10 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.114.40.18 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUKDAg1NjRWV1V9fnyg op/DxcLk5uP8/voi63ReAAAACXBIWXMAAAWJAAAFiQFtaJ36AAAAB3RJTUUH1goZAgAz00bgXgAA AeVJREFUKM9lk0Fz2jAQhQXJD3CCO70CmcC1YMtcWyTZ14Bl69xats4N9r6/3zWQBlodNKNPu/s0 b1cCQFuZGpfVVh3vAvBJolIXRkapSuoRUtIdFyo1Y5xSdlAj7OtvD1XnXxmWRi+eWgcxyCed1lVV B1CrKyujMoi+eLA5kU1SsjoHlW+nQjTtFxk4MXgrOxvIqzoTZR8XgPaLl419zgsMaSGFPiUOZCIh thsx5Xy9NsK8Kwf/JoQgMxcVJ301HKkcSWaT0O7FY056J4U9xcYfnmVXG4801lW6lqwu2nKFZoHC HuzvaTVndZ+LaRQgZdthXw1cpynEkLEwyFHXk/aIxNQ6QeooJuzPMB+wn+D7JJNsiCcVA13/A3h/ xE9J+WidpAwoYNmRFwyvSRhNVtsdaAewzZZP5uw82QL9+tyNfocyP0McAzICUr5Mk9RdIjWasUNx aIIt6NK4ZtXIMdfMQt3nuMAyWbLI4DqZ4xPq/ag8jPond4XU/cLuOgw6XCFX/YCUfcDAMMH58fD4 G9kDchwfqVefkBwup2uZM+Q4WhJt5jN3AxXCsaS2yXEDuWgS8VOzW0gFjhEPmLyFMKBFaLb1HRwc DiaKwx0EeTMRYnYPQRW3PP4HApvlMv0PttX5v/D6Aws3IOSEwzmLAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.96 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:wtiS1uKoYXdqStvsBwGLW9H+Ybk= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150267 Archived-At: On 2012-05-05 10:25 +0800, Deniz Dogan wrote: > "Inspired" by C-x + and C-x -, I wrote a patch which lets the user > repeat the { or } character to continue enlarging/shrinking the > selected window's width. > > The patch needs a much better docstring, I'm just too lazy to write > one. I have access to commit, but I wanted to check it with you guys > first. > > Comments? FWIW, it is better to bring in a new function `make-command-repeatable' possibly built on top of repeat.el that accepts a command and make it repeatable. Leo