From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: fix for bug 10994 breaks ido customizations in major way Date: Wed, 08 May 2013 08:04:19 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87txmfyb9n.fsf@gmail.com> <432AFE3B3321498E9B17075D3B55A60B@us.oracle.com> <87y5bqty1w.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqrar2g9.fsf@wanadoo.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1367971479 16547 80.91.229.3 (8 May 2013 00:04:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 8 May 2013 00:04:39 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 08 02:04:38 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UZrs3-0000lI-Uh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 02:04:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36384 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZrs3-0007Ez-DS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 20:04:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50886) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZrrz-0007Eg-QO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 20:04:32 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZrrz-0007gL-2g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 20:04:31 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:48784) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UZrry-0007gE-SP for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 May 2013 20:04:31 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UZrrx-0000fR-F0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 08 May 2013 02:04:29 +0200 Original-Received: from li511-224.members.linode.com ([66.175.216.224]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 May 2013 02:04:29 +0200 Original-Received: from sdl.web by li511-224.members.linode.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 08 May 2013 02:04:29 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: li511-224.members.linode.com Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoBAMAAAB+0KVeAAAAGFBMVEUKDAg1NjRWV1V9fnyg op/DxcLk5uP8/voi63ReAAAACXBIWXMAAAWJAAAFiQFtaJ36AAAAB3RJTUUH1goZAgAz00bgXgAA AeVJREFUKM9lk0Fz2jAQhQXJD3CCO70CmcC1YMtcWyTZ14Bl69xats4N9r6/3zWQBlodNKNPu/s0 b1cCQFuZGpfVVh3vAvBJolIXRkapSuoRUtIdFyo1Y5xSdlAj7OtvD1XnXxmWRi+eWgcxyCed1lVV B1CrKyujMoi+eLA5kU1SsjoHlW+nQjTtFxk4MXgrOxvIqzoTZR8XgPaLl419zgsMaSGFPiUOZCIh thsx5Xy9NsK8Kwf/JoQgMxcVJ301HKkcSWaT0O7FY056J4U9xcYfnmVXG4801lW6lqwu2nKFZoHC HuzvaTVndZ+LaRQgZdthXw1cpynEkLEwyFHXk/aIxNQ6QeooJuzPMB+wn+D7JJNsiCcVA13/A3h/ xE9J+WidpAwoYNmRFwyvSRhNVtsdaAewzZZP5uw82QL9+tyNfocyP0McAzICUr5Mk9RdIjWasUNx aIIt6NK4ZtXIMdfMQt3nuMAyWbLI4DqZ4xPq/ag8jPond4XU/cLuOgw6XCFX/YCUfcDAMMH58fD4 G9kDchwfqVefkBwup2uZM+Q4WhJt5jN3AxXCsaS2yXEDuWgS8VOzW0gFjhEPmLyFMKBFaLb1HRwc DiaKwx0EeTMRYnYPQRW3PP4HApvlMv0PttX5v/D6Aws3IOSEwzmLAAAAAElFTkSuQmCC User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.8.3) Cancel-Lock: sha1:bftZLSbeRffiShSFU3NL95S2re8= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159414 Archived-At: On 2013-05-08 03:53 +0800, Óscar Fuentes wrote: > You are inconveniencing a real (and quite useulf, IMHO) application because > some imaginary, unspecified application? > > And, have you considered that there are users who don't see any coloring > on Emacs? (because the limitations of their terminals, or because they > are using voice-to-speach systems, or simply because they regard > anything but raw text as distracting noise.) When I was coming up with a fix for bug#10994 I have already considered removing duplicates as an option. But I rejected it on the basis of that being the responsibility of the caller and do not want to take that away from the programmers. Anyway, I'll see if I can bake these two options in. Leo