From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Some findings and suggestion about Emacs on w32 Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:36:11 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <008d01c4b886$32d07ff0$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <00d901c4b900$9b774500$0200a8c0@sedrcw11488> <417C339E.8080406@wyrdrune.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098661005 4104 80.91.229.6 (24 Oct 2004 23:36:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Oct 2004 23:36:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lennart Borgman , Emacs Devel , "Kim F. Storm" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 25 01:36:35 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CLrud-0003i9-00 for ; Mon, 25 Oct 2004 01:36:35 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLs2F-0003Qt-MA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:44:27 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CLs28-0003Qn-ST for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:44:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CLs28-0003QX-Bm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:44:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CLs27-0003QN-Q7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:44:20 -0400 Original-Received: from [206.47.199.164] (helo=simmts6-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CLruG-0001mL-1S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:36:12 -0400 Original-Received: from empanada.home ([67.71.35.140]) by simmts6-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20041024233611.VLTB1635.simmts6-srv.bellnexxia.net@empanada.home>; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:36:11 -0400 Original-Received: by empanada.home (Postfix, from userid 502) id 2D19A33B818; Sun, 24 Oct 2004 19:36:11 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Guy Gascoigne-Piggford In-Reply-To: <417C339E.8080406@wyrdrune.com> (Guy Gascoigne-Piggford's message of "Sun, 24 Oct 2004 15:58:38 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (darwin) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:28868 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:28868 > Actually I think that it's the other way around. The first server is > listening and so the second can't bind to the port and so errors out. That hasn't been my experience, and disagrees with the comments (and messages) in the server.el code. Maybe it depends on the underlying OS? Stefan