From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Typo?: (gnus-topic-find-topology topic nil nil gnus-topic-topology) Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2012 09:12:52 +0800 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1325639604 30492 80.91.229.12 (4 Jan 2012 01:13:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 01:13:24 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jan 04 02:13:20 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFPp-0007BW-S8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 02:13:17 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41115 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFPp-0001Bm-BU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:13:17 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54744) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFPm-0001BZ-BG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:13:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFPl-0006n2-9R for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:13:14 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:42128) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFPk-0006my-Sg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Jan 2012 20:13:13 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RiFPj-0007AJ-0s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 02:13:11 +0100 Original-Received: from 123.114.37.7 ([123.114.37.7]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 02:13:11 +0100 Original-Received: from sdl.web by 123.114.37.7 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 04 Jan 2012 02:13:11 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 8 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 123.114.37.7 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACkAAAApAQAAAACAGz1bAAABKElEQVQYlWNg3NIt5FDPUPt7 4+X79Qyucz5/ugik+L2PBgKpyphaIK921q23QDnG0NBQoMr/vaWl9f8ZLL78uPv5PwN7RETfzXoG jhmFz27XM0RXmpuY/WfY+fv0Mc56BvFybfXA/wwL5t/wF61n2PU59axXPcOVzbmSW/8zrNt1benC /ww70hqUU/4zKCtrT9jwn8FhwynbufUMendE2aLqGRpdX9al1zM8eh17lKeeQcTMrdD5P8P3j/YT Q/8zXHSb7p1Qz/C4OM2JuZ7hgtI7K6AjqsMnf8j4z8C6xG1tw3+GqpqvsVn/GTzmpD9j/8/wP/oZ S/l/Bka+QO/g/wy15ueeFQL9N1O8mPU/g+umV3t1gdT0/1bTgHLqYVeXAlWKpMWt+w8Az82C9nHf X0cAAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3.50 (Mac OS X 10.6.8) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZqiddJsjUGcdnK1UscZqwouJHGg= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:147245 Archived-At: On 2012-01-04 03:49 +0800, Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: > Yes, so if `gnus-topic-topology' is non-nil, the topology in question > will be removed. Which seems natural for `gnus-topic-kill-group', I > think. Unless I'm misreading the code. Agree. Leo