From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: "Robert J. Chassell" <bob@rattlesnake.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: rcirc manual
Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:29:02 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <m1EyGMw-0004EmC@rattlesnake.com>
References: <87ek3hgunn.fsf@killalla.dreaming> <uek3cs78r.fsf@gnu.org>
	<jkmzi0m8md.fsf@glug.org> <u1wzcruk3.fsf@gnu.org>
	<m1ExXDb-0004EmC@rattlesnake.com> <umzhz19bs.fsf@gnu.org>
	<E1Ey2eC-0006ED-Er@fencepost.gnu.org> <uvewl5l2p.fsf@gnu.org>
Reply-To: bob@rattlesnake.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137364224 28643 80.91.229.2 (15 Jan 2006 22:30:24 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:30:24 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: karl@freefriends.org
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Jan 15 23:30:20 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EyGO3-0003bk-FL
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 23:30:12 +0100
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EyGQI-0000sK-Uk
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:32:30 -0500
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EyGPr-0000oW-94
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:32:03 -0500
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1EyGPo-0000nN-Ne
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:32:02 -0500
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EyGPo-0000nF-EJ
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:32:00 -0500
Original-Received: from [69.168.108.225] (helo=rattlesnake.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EyGTD-0004bo-Dy
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:35:31 -0500
Original-Received: by rattlesnake.com via sendmail from stdin
	id <m1EyGMw-0004EmC@rattlesnake.com> (Debian Smail3.2.0.115)
	Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:29:02 +0000 (UTC) 
Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
In-reply-to: <uvewl5l2p.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Sun, 15
	Jan 2006 21:48:30 +0200)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49141
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/49141>

   In any case, the explanation in the Texinfo manual should be more
   clear on this, IMHO.  It should explain what keys are suitable for
   @key, and why.

Yes.  In the past I thought the explanation was clear enough, but I'm wrong.
Eli is right.

-- 
    Robert J. Chassell                         
    bob@rattlesnake.com                         GnuPG Key ID: 004B4AC8
    http://www.rattlesnake.com                  http://www.teak.cc