From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Robert J. Chassell" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RMAIL slows Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 19:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <85ll7m8nbq.fsf@gnu.org> <87r7gln4r1.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <87psw4gt8x.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> Reply-To: bob@rattlesnake.com NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1115406452 32021 80.91.229.2 (6 May 2005 19:07:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 19:07:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ihs_4664@yahoo.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 06 21:07:31 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DU89h-00046s-4T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2005 21:06:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DU8HS-0007sl-UT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 May 2005 15:14:35 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DU8B4-0004xE-Ul for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2005 15:07:59 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DU8B1-0004vH-Jz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2005 15:07:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DU8B1-0004us-2x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2005 15:07:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [69.168.108.225] (helo=rattlesnake.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DU8Bv-0005sJ-VA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 May 2005 15:08:52 -0400 Original-Received: by rattlesnake.com via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.115) Fri, 6 May 2005 19:03:04 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: Stefan Monnier In-reply-to: <87psw4gt8x.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (message from Stefan Monnier on Fri, 06 May 2005 13:32:14 -0400) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36773 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36773 [I just sent a message saying I first had (add-hook 'rmail-show-message-hook 'goto-address) in my .emacs file. I got many overlapping overlays. Then I commented that line out and started a new instance of Emacs. I got only two overlays, neither overlapping.] Now I have uncommented the line and started yet a newer instance of Emacs. So I add the hook again. On doing this for the same RMAIL file as before on the same message: (pp (save-restriction (widen) (overlays-in (point-min) (point-max))) (get-buffer-create "*overlays*")) I see the following: (# # # # # #) Two overlays overlap: # # For this, the overlay properties for `nth 0' are (face bold) but for `nth 1' are (goto-address t keymap (keymap (3 keymap (13 . goto-address-at-point)) (mouse-2 . goto-address-at-mouse)) help-echo "mouse-2, C-c RET: mail this address" mouse-face secondary-selection face italic) For `nth 2' they are (face bold) again. Hope this helps! -- Robert J. Chassell bob@rattlesnake.com GnuPG Key ID: 004B4AC8 http://www.rattlesnake.com http://www.teak.cc