From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Robert J. Chassell" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Apropos scoring Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 10:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <84znkk1jcl.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <5x8yr4o7vk.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <844r1s3y0x.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> <5xhe5rdz3p.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> <84r84urdr6.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> Reply-To: bob@rattlesnake.com NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1058093619 13419 80.91.224.249 (13 Jul 2003 10:53:39 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Jul 2003 10:53:39 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 13 12:53:38 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 19beU6-0003UJ-00 for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 12:53:38 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 19begp-0003cS-00 for ; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 13:06:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19beUU-0008M1-6F for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 06:54:02 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19beT0-00075R-7J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 06:52:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19beSB-0006Xg-VJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 06:51:40 -0400 Original-Received: from megalith.rattlesnake.com ([140.186.114.245] helo=rattlesnake.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19beNm-0003lM-7Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 13 Jul 2003 06:47:06 -0400 Original-Received: by rattlesnake.com via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.114) Sun, 13 Jul 2003 10:46:59 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-reply-to: <84r84urdr6.fsf@lucy.is.informatik.uni-duisburg.de> (kai.grossjohann@gmx.net) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:15578 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:15578 kai.grossjohann@gmx.net wroteMail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org I think it's also useful to have lexical ordering, but scores shown. Yes, I agree. That is what I would choose, lexical ordering with scores shown. I dislike non-lexical ordering, but do like scoring. -- Robert J. Chassell Rattlesnake Enterprises http://www.rattlesnake.com GnuPG Key ID: 004B4AC8 http://www.teak.cc bob@rattlesnake.com