From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Delayed loading of image libraries Date: 30 Jun 2004 10:19:47 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <20040610133420.CAC7.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> <20040630123512.BD0D.JMBARRANQUERO@wke.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1088605254 14860 80.91.224.253 (30 Jun 2004 14:20:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Jun 2004 14:20:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 30 16:20:45 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bffx7-0006Hl-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:20:45 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1Bffx7-0001XT-00 for ; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 16:20:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bffyp-00049g-Lx for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:22:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BffyC-0003vY-6g for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:21:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BffyA-0003tU-1p for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:21:51 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bffy9-0003tG-Px for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:21:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [206.47.199.141] (helo=simmts12-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BffwD-0008BA-Tc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:19:50 -0400 Original-Received: from empanada.local ([67.71.118.189]) by simmts12-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20040630141932.MMQZ7058.simmts12-srv.bellnexxia.net@empanada.local>; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:19:32 -0400 Original-Received: by empanada.local (Postfix, from userid 502) id 5D478228BF4; Wed, 30 Jun 2004 10:19:48 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Andreas Schwab In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 15 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:25332 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:25332 >>> Please make libraries an explicit parameter of CHECK_LIB_AVAILABLE, so >>> that it does not look like it is completely ignored. >> >> Well, it is a matter of taste. Hidding things is not good, but >> redundant info is not good either, and in this case, there's no way >> CHECK_LIB_AVAILABLE is ever gonna get passed anything but `libraries'. > Implicit parameters are bad when you want to find out what's going on and > can hide hard to track bugs. 100% agreement. Please don't introduce such situations unless it's really painful to pass the parameters explicitly. Stefan