From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Robert J. Chassell" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Customize fringe Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 11:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <877kmd7bf5.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> <87helh5f96.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp> <2950-Fri10May2002095256+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il> <5xsn509w7x.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> Reply-To: bob@rattlesnake.com NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1021028949 28230 127.0.0.1 (10 May 2002 11:09:09 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 11:09:09 +0000 (UTC) Cc: bob@rattlesnake.com Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian)) id 1768Gr-0007LD-00 for ; Fri, 10 May 2002 13:09:09 +0200 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 1768Pv-0007Jh-00 for ; Fri, 10 May 2002 13:18:31 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1768Gw-000640-00; Fri, 10 May 2002 07:09:14 -0400 Original-Received: from megalith.rattlesnake.com ([140.186.114.245] helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian)) id 1768GF-00062t-00 for ; Fri, 10 May 2002 07:08:31 -0400 Original-Received: by rattlesnake.com via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.114) Fri, 10 May 2002 11:08:30 +0000 (UTC) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <5xsn509w7x.fsf@kfs2.cua.dk> (storm@cua.dk) Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9 Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:3803 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:3803 My mistake and my apologies, it was storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) who wrote: In any case, I think general fringe on/off will be less useful once fringes are per buffer/window rather than per frame. -- Robert J. Chassell bob@rattlesnake.com Rattlesnake Enterprises http://www.rattlesnake.com