From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Diff by branch tag and date? Maybe with PCL-CVS? Date: 31 Aug 2004 10:11:29 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1093962229 24422 80.91.224.253 (31 Aug 2004 14:23:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2004 14:23:49 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 31 16:23:34 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1C29Mi-0001YD-00 for ; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 16:12:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C29Ra-0001xq-HP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:17:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C29RS-0001wV-6s for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:16:58 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C29RP-0001w0-Sp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:16:57 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C29RP-0001vx-Qq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:16:55 -0400 Original-Received: from [206.47.199.163] (helo=simmts5-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C29MB-00028V-Ax for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:11:31 -0400 Original-Received: from empanada-wifi.home ([67.68.217.250]) by simmts5-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20040831140947.PFJF1635.simmts5-srv.bellnexxia.net@empanada-wifi.home>; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:09:47 -0400 Original-Received: by empanada-wifi.home (Postfix, from userid 502) id 8EF672CD54F; Tue, 31 Aug 2004 10:11:29 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: Original-Lines: 13 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:26648 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:26648 > I have a working copy with the gnus-5_10-branch (up to date) and two > quite big patches (KY.patch and SJ.patch) that should be applied to > the branch. (At a later time, I want to be able to identify those > changes.) Is the following procedure correct (and reasonable)? [...] Yes, it's correct and sadly reasonable (in any recent system, like Arch, you don't need any such thing since each commit gets its own name). This has nothing to do with Emacs, tho. info-cvs@gnu.org is probably more appropriate. Stefan