From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Highlighting in grep buffer Date: 11 Apr 2004 19:20:25 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: References: <87hdvvhzgh.fsf@mail.jurta.org> <87isgafmte.fsf-monnier+emacs@alfajor.local> <87isg7cmcy.fsf@mail.jurta.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1081741812 25784 80.91.224.253 (12 Apr 2004 03:50:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2004 03:50:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 12 05:50:06 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BCsSU-0002vI-00 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 05:50:06 +0200 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BCsST-00089y-00 for ; Mon, 12 Apr 2004 05:50:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BCoJt-0008G0-G4 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:24:57 -0400 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BCoJI-0008DK-Ss for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:24:20 -0400 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BCoIi-0007vY-Dk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:24:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [206.47.199.164] (helo=simmts6-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BCoFa-0006Jh-Nz; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:20:30 -0400 Original-Received: from empanada.local ([67.70.165.72]) by simmts6-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.05 201-253-122-130-105-20030824) with ESMTP id <20040411232025.QUKN8424.simmts6-srv.bellnexxia.net@empanada.local>; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:20:25 -0400 Original-Received: by empanada.local (Postfix, from userid 502) id 13C32152E33; Sun, 11 Apr 2004 19:20:26 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Juri Linkov In-Reply-To: <87isg7cmcy.fsf@mail.jurta.org> Original-Lines: 10 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.4 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:21488 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:21488 > Yes, calling the ansi-color-apply-on-region would be better from the > process filter, but there is a danger that boundaries of strings that > a process gives to the filter function will be inside an ANSI escape > sequence, which will screw up its fontification. All process filters have code to deal with this problem. I.e. it's a non-problem. Stefan