From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rudolf Schlatte Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should yaml-ts-mode inherit from prog-mode? Date: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 10:00:50 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87o7pb1d5h.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="37806"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.2 (darwin) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:tMbn+PW7OeuOttQrC3fiG0SVY9s= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Mar 03 12:24:59 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pY3X1-0009cP-3G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 12:24:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pY3WJ-0002fU-MX; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 06:24:15 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pY1Hi-0004kD-Jw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 04:01:02 -0500 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1pY1Hg-0007gW-DS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 04:01:02 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1pY1Hd-00060X-II for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Mar 2023 10:00:57 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Fri, 03 Mar 2023 06:24:13 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:303920 Archived-At: Philip Kaludercic writes: > Deriving from prog-mode or from text-mode doesn't mean much in practice. > I see it as less of a formal taxonomy of programming languages, and more > of a convenience measure to make changes that (vaguely speaking) "all > programming modes" or "all text-related modes" have in common. E.g. I > have this in my init.el: > > (add-hook 'text-mode-hook #'flyspell-mode) > (add-hook 'prog-mode-hook #'flyspell-prog-mode) Similarly, I use variable-width fonts for text mode buffers and fixed width fonts for prog-mode buffers. Since in yaml indentation is significant, it would be preferrable for me to have yaml-mode inherit from prog-mode, if only for convenience's sake.