From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Leo Liu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: maintain flymake.el Date: Sat, 07 Dec 2013 10:21:47 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87a9gdzx63.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1386382922 22055 80.91.229.3 (7 Dec 2013 02:22:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 7 Dec 2013 02:22:02 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 07 03:22:09 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Vp7Wz-0004Yx-2D for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 07 Dec 2013 03:22:09 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34301 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vp7Wy-00016D-JB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 21:22:08 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37810) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vp7Wq-00013F-8e for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 21:22:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vp7Wk-0006Io-N0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 21:22:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-pd0-x235.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235]:57856) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Vp7Wk-0006Ij-FB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 21:21:54 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-pd0-f181.google.com with SMTP id p10so1980305pdj.40 for ; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:21:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:references:face:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=vhRneeKwmMnooIMFsuthZvnkJ15xhb4wby8GHsHBZj4=; b=JPzPKQpahi3/cNba8yVXV3FMFs0IRQiQKEQyYnly90NKkkb1TwZCU3wl8InzN/rc+J PJaYckqFhDoOlaSDdnsh16Ki3xSq2oUKRJDbPFgTNk+G8fQkvMPKwwGJJuxb4bmHdvU1 G8rg40Lgw+/J+RcM0DgSUCoxT+T9kY7+bKLFOB5oIuhOJdyMKhLqYfPINEUy3eMP7KWp jrHoIfRy3rEO+XseXI8EkCYSx0P/kE9RUjg9sthXJXr3qw12DPI1MyFKrcGSojB3C8nw lIBNU6xzFpILN1fCPSUsWtp9Qs9zrD58gXvSk08tXZh+P5ptsQ4iuXGCC7NyLUZ5UsUL Rz1A== X-Received: by 10.68.231.166 with SMTP id th6mr7640839pbc.27.1386382913279; Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:21:53 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from localhost ([123.119.93.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id ef10sm1260375pac.1.2013.12.06.18.21.51 for (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 06 Dec 2013 18:21:52 -0800 (PST) Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAACgAAAAoAgMAAADxkFD+AAAADFBMVEUvT09qWs3/pQD///+J kUVcAAAAAWJLR0QAiAUdSAAAAAlwSFlzAAALEwAACxMBAJqcGAAAAAd0SU1FB9cBBwMLOd3veKQA AACuSURBVBjTldE9CgIxEAXgB+lEyFUC2wo5ikdZ8DSypxhMY7H9VuIVwlqkGRgnm59VsHGafIQ3 CZlAtmKIRaHETgYa12lqvEsPYKf8wXHsPGfqPaUM0g9aJPKFXkmNQmSDqwzz4Fpgpz+6WAPY2z5o uPJJpu0uypcl4nyCibMLQ8lCiVjayLoQvw5LsVKQuHPRR958HZbOcVsKeepcLxpByjycGvnKmY+c MBvrtyjfe0vmuLvdq/kAAAAASUVORK5CYII= In-Reply-To: <87a9gdzx63.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 06 Dec 2013 12:50:12 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (OS X 10.9) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:400e:c02::235 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166183 Archived-At: On 2013-12-07 01:50 +0800, Ted Zlatanov wrote: > No objection, but I wanted to mention (since I use it) > https://github.com/flycheck/flycheck and that I hope there could be some > reconciliation between their configuration styles. As the maintainer > of cfengine.el I'd like to have a way to support both tools without > maintaining two different configuration variables. I'll keep this in mind. My plan is to clean it up first then new development. Leo