From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: George Plymale II Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should this package be included into the NS port? Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 11:38:16 -0400 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1526744223 11486 195.159.176.226 (19 May 2018 15:37:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 19 May 2018 15:37:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Nick Helm Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat May 19 17:36:59 2018 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1fK3ul-0002on-1Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 May 2018 17:36:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43520 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fK3wq-0001q9-86 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 19 May 2018 11:39:08 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36528) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fK3w9-0001q3-Po for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2018 11:38:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fK3w4-0007p7-KA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2018 11:38:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-io0-x236.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::236]:44463) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fK3w4-0007oi-F1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 19 May 2018 11:38:20 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-io0-x236.google.com with SMTP id d11-v6so9704527iof.11 for ; Sat, 19 May 2018 08:38:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=orbitalimpact.com; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=lUDqz19fRzsc4rYYCDcH9C6gJmSR2OAafmxCRoQXlBU=; b=ZNZzzj9KjHIaoLXaeLOM1VFZW33XmZYqc51jr+cKTFm+JOxlsMk6bPr+UHl7C/05kj 0yCk+VqJj+PiU5CRD4Khm52IqiaYj1qFJZ1NReGssKkl8vaXFusc+CHiZmt1Cz7qRnHF z732Mnsh5T+miawT7bU3SHwabARdBvBm6y8yk= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date:message-id :mime-version; bh=lUDqz19fRzsc4rYYCDcH9C6gJmSR2OAafmxCRoQXlBU=; b=aMnPD5GS7u1xxRMJA3yzAFD3JCLDT00jfiEFTYFSqf0aB9hyJ/0FTUfmsJHbRaPGrK +GxUhh4mcjzhGPzELDp5Sx9IH/iUXVq8ihpmFoIzk1Nc6qGFE665tOnZ7MD58KnaqfOz iKyuAJ9IwFkZKylf55TIgFUSzeDUBC/9wfekkWu0LlPEMNBc0TB9YDr1qaAgpO1mB5zw U2Oz8zxPdTUN6j4j46n/WEGM3hy4t1XMfVkshS+G8v2m4/3WDDdAc/Pp1nt0iUu/sU/2 Oa3Vn/yZqhsKcV+ayd0NrbOpapOrak9/PcvOY/K5fjiZWgq/bVM5PShVD4k47SHRiK7/ 19kQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALKqPwfkveysad0QVSmELLKviq2PrjX1s/ycPgF4/RrubaEsPBfrbh2u P4dz+JSs1/94CZSEjYe7zMU0r49T X-Google-Smtp-Source: AB8JxZqO9qhz532fCw0pARJty9emGMQ+QiPqY1QTQBA/wA17KoWB1cWFMUr8PYhwsXga27r9KUC7/w== X-Received: by 2002:a6b:10ea:: with SMTP id 103-v6mr15223699ioq.260.1526744298324; Sat, 19 May 2018 08:38:18 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from lehi.dev.orbitalimpact.com (ip-6-39-52-196.chicago.us.northamericancoax.com. [196.52.39.6]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id j63-v6sm6050484itb.2.2018.05.19.08.38.17 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-CHACHA20-POLY1305 bits=256/256); Sat, 19 May 2018 08:38:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (message from Nick Helm on Sat, 19 May 2018 16:29:20 +1200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c06::236 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:225442 Archived-At: Nick Helm writes: > IMO, these aren't good solutions though, as they just mask NS's bad > behaviour. Sure, it would be ideal to actually fix the issue. I'm all for that. However, I don't think we should completely discount the usage of osx-pseudo-daemon in case we can't fix the issue for whatever reason. - George Plymale II