From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Paul Michael Reilly Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Rmail/mbox merging Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:43:13 -0400 Message-ID: Reply-To: pmr@pajato.com NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1220103855 13769 80.91.229.12 (30 Aug 2008 13:44:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2008 13:44:15 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 30 15:45:09 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KZQlI-0002eU-3v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 15:45:08 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38014 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZQkJ-0002MB-F3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:44:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZQkF-0002M6-Jv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:44:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KZQkD-0002Lr-6m for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:44:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36693 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KZQkC-0002Lo-Tl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:44:00 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.pajato.com ([68.191.253.210]:39325 helo=copa.pajato.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KZQkC-0004LA-Lc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:44:00 -0400 Original-Received: from lilly.pajato.com (copa.pajato.com [68.191.253.210]) by copa.pajato.com (8.14.1/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m7UDhxac008159 for ; Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:43:59 -0400 X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (copa.pajato.com [68.191.253.210]); Sat, 30 Aug 2008 09:43:59 -0400 (EDT) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:103263 Archived-At: I am of the opinion that Rmail/mbox does not need to support converting to Babyl format. Is anyone willing to try to make the case that it should? If I absolutely had to convert an Rmail/mbox RMAIL file to Babyl I would be inclined to rename the RMAIL file and use that as a mailbox source for a pre Rmail/mbox version of Emacs. So I'm concluding that rmail-convert-to-babyl is no longer necessary in Rmail/mbox. -pmr