Richard Stallman writes: > I thought we were talking about the trunk. I thought so as well. > If this change is only for the multi-tty branch, I don't mind > adding a new element to the frame struct in that branch. OK, then I'll apply the complete fix there. The incomplete (but Lisp-level) fix should definitely go in the trunk, though. > Is there a problem with these commands in the trunk? Yes: `next-buffer' and `previous-buffer' should behave frame-locally. -- Károly