From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: lorentey@elte.hu (=?utf-8?Q?L=C5=91rentey_K=C3=A1roly?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Buffer listing in multiple frames/ttys Date: Tue, 06 Dec 2005 19:09:11 +0100 Organization: =?utf-8?B?RcO2dHbDtnMgTG9yw6FuZA==?= University (ELTE), Budapest, Hungary Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133900170 9999 80.91.229.2 (6 Dec 2005 20:16:10 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2005 20:16:10 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Dec 06 21:16:00 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjjBV-0008LR-SC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:13:10 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjjBi-00081x-48 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:13:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EjjBX-00081q-5D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:13:11 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EjjBV-00081I-Lf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:13:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EjjBU-000818-CH for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:13:09 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1EjjCC-00011i-Ke for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 15:13:53 -0500 Original-Received: from root by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ejj9C-0007M3-6r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:10:46 +0100 Original-Received: from walrus.inf.elte.hu ([157.181.166.149]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:10:46 +0100 Original-Received: from lorentey by walrus.inf.elte.hu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2005 21:10:46 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: walrus.inf.elte.hu Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADEAAAAwCAMAAACPHmKLAAAAM1BMVEU4AACgionl0MpnW1C5 e3yFUE23mnvxuLWCc2fcmpaukoGhaGllOTOTb2t6VlHfw6tRODF/A7ocAAAAAXRSTlMAQObYZgAA AAFiS0dEAIgFHUgAAAIeSURBVHic1ZbrcqswDITxBbANvrz/055dydCkYJL+PJpMyaT6sloJo0zT /xUp/SndhZDSsnwNIZ9IXRif04OGI7N8wzimp5QEU6LWR8A511WAdZH64Mf1kPyFGmLmQeTIPz2w ps+EdLZqkHhElEjJMKy1BzckmgDGuMYAqgx1HiQC8vcezSkzbjA9GMfcGSFQqIIMbQQTqDAfAQQy Y8IZJxUhdZMQpoWxjQK7BDTdKyOI/QLwGoo4c4tIS/fC2PKJgCES7IUprQM5s/z5JIjgP5jNBeDn yM+ltF0JFJez91m+DZ1/I8TBznpAqEb0ek1bUXl3IWAgb2f4GFFeySB7S9o7gR6Jh147rjFKf7cY s2jsv5xzbCUbcxIxrpFvoxL7hZhQPglzEisiyl+Piu6I+YfYlJB0EnJTXic4o08C9JmDIGZJzLcE OmtEQ24ntkAJu26c+xWgE6nqpb2AQEQSdwBaLERmdCNKRD8ApoYjbjh0NRIrOksfax4AUzNCzMf9 npIQcZSPh7QSejrw/Zg3nA8FEEYJHbvMfFmv5+JCmBeCI38CDo2sRcFxrav5LCFGvFfgaQ9036JB Fbmn7AAwUDZYAIcGTtacF5R1/9CxkoXskwil4HjlNFpn1v4mMHQeeQA23c0Cz25FQsinEdRFoC7p 5ncA1goXTJDXj/dUuW9uN60lYl7y+V6JemzCK2Frklj0ApGUuDYO4q3J/wDffCXdfiy3fgAAAABJ RU5ErkJggg== User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.52 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:HKxVGfk6pXccFls3z10Xtyd/wLQ= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:47065 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > I may have misunderstood (I have not been following the latest part > of this thread closely), but IIUC this would, for the same reasons > discussed earlier, be inappropriate for many of us who use > pop-up-frames = t. Well, if you say so, then we should make it optional. I would really prefer not to introduce yet another user option for this, though. Therefore I suggest that we reuse the new `Buffer-menu-use-frame-buffer-list' option for this as well. (After renaming it to something generic, say, `use-frame-buffer-list'.) There is little reason to keep them separate. -- Károly