From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: lorentey@elte.hu (=?utf-8?Q?L=C5=91rentey_K=C3=A1roly?=) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Buffer listing in multiple frames/ttys Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:21:39 +0100 Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1133371489 3194 80.91.229.2 (30 Nov 2005 17:24:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:24:49 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 30 18:24:46 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EhUo5-000401-V8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:27:46 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EhUo5-0003et-AN for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 11:27:45 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EhRtf-0000rC-O3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:21:20 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1EhRtc-0000qX-Gj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:21:17 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EhRtZ-0000q7-MS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:21:14 -0500 Original-Received: from [212.92.23.158] (helo=ninsei.hu) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1EhRtZ-0005oA-HC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 08:21:13 -0500 Original-Received: from walrus (walrus.inf.elte.hu [157.181.166.149]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by chatsubo.ninsei.hu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 122CE1AD68 for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:21:12 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by walrus (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 211766110; Wed, 30 Nov 2005 14:21:40 +0100 (CET) Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 29 Nov 2005 07:36:16 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/22.0.52 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:46815 Archived-At: Drew Adams writes: > C-x C-b from various buffers > > Perhaps there is a bug in the buffer list for each frame - or > perhaps the doc (Info) is not clear? When I do (frame-parameter > (selected-frame) 'buffer-list) in the different frames, each is a > list of multiple buffers (in spite of pop-up-frames forcing one > buffer per frame), and they are in different orders. I think I have found the problem. When you use C-x 4 C-f, the new buffer gets displayed by `pop-to-buffer', and that function records the newly created buffer in the buffer list of the existing frame as well as the new frame. This is clearly not right. I removed the duplicate call to record_buffer in CVS. --=20 K=C3=A1roly