From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tom Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Limit what M-x TAB lists? Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 17:50:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <87bo03itkn.fsf@building.gnus.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1388080292 20732 80.91.229.3 (26 Dec 2013 17:51:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 26 Dec 2013 17:51:32 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 26 18:51:38 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VwF5p-0004Uk-By for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:51:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46490 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwF5o-0001FA-WD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:51:33 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56521) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwF5e-00013C-Vu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:51:29 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwF5X-000356-T4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:51:22 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:57279) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VwF5X-00034x-LU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 12:51:15 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VwF5V-0004Md-KC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:51:13 +0100 Original-Received: from 217-197-180-113.pool.digikabel.hu ([217.197.180.113]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:51:13 +0100 Original-Received: from adatgyujto by 217-197-180-113.pool.digikabel.hu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 26 Dec 2013 18:51:13 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 15 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 217.197.180.113 (Opera/9.80 (Windows NT 6.1) Presto/2.12.388 Version/12.16) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:166898 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen gnus.org> writes: > > Here's today's unrealistic idea: Wouldn't it be nice if `M-x fooTAB' was > more useful? > An alternative approach can be changing the order of items. The more frequently a command is used the higher it would be listed, so your most frequently used commands would float to the top of the completion list and you'd find them easier.