From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thomas Lynch Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: interjecting a custom epa passphrase prompt Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 03:43:02 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1305864318 28384 80.91.229.12 (20 May 2011 04:05:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 20 May 2011 04:05:18 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri May 20 06:05:14 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QNGxd-0003ac-Jd for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:05:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43864 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNGxd-0004gz-2J for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:05:13 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:36883) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNGxa-0004gs-S6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:05:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNGxZ-0003yx-T2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:05:10 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:46490) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QNGxZ-0003yT-My for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 00:05:09 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QNGxW-0003Ww-Jv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:05:07 +0200 Original-Received: from pluto.cavehill.uwi.edu ([205.214.198.1]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:05:06 +0200 Original-Received: from dimitrisdad by pluto.cavehill.uwi.edu with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 20 May 2011 06:05:06 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 7 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 205.214.198.1 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:2.0b12) Gecko/20110222 Firefox/4.0b12) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:139539 Archived-At: Ah, this is awful. I am writing am writing an automated program where many passphrases are being generated, but the call back to get the passphrase is not working. Why would someone who doesn't know my needs make a design decision that can't even be worked around and break my code? The SUSE update distribution has dependencies on gpg 2 and looks like other things will break if I uninstall it.