From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: A Soare Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: line-move-down-up Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:51:20 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1303138313 19074 80.91.229.12 (18 Apr 2011 14:51:53 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:51:53 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 18 16:51:49 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QBpno-0005Nz-I8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:51:48 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:38789 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBpno-0003uf-5y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:51:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:46045) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBpnl-0003uJ-IF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:51:46 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBpnk-0006vw-Jd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:51:45 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:60715) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QBpnk-0006v5-Dn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 10:51:44 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QBpne-0005Db-GR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:51:38 +0200 Original-Received: from 89.238.213.66 ([89.238.213.66]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:51:38 +0200 Original-Received: from as1789 by 89.238.213.66 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 18 Apr 2011 16:51:38 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 22 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 89.238.213.66 (Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; fr; rv:1.9.2.10) Gecko/20100922 Ubuntu/10.10 (maverick) Firefox/3.6.10) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138552 Archived-At: > > I have just received a reponse that transpose-line does the same job. Yes, this is almost identical to transpose-line. But transpose-line behaves a little different. This is why I forget all the time about that function, and never use it. > Also, (next-line n) (beginning-of-line) could be replaced > with (beginning-of-line (1+ n)). > This is wrong in general. Alin