From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: John Owens Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: issues migrating to cocoa emacs (23.2) from carbon emacs (22) Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1276273811 22208 80.91.229.12 (11 Jun 2010 16:30:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2010 16:30:11 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jun 11 18:30:10 2010 connect(): No such file or directory Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ON77R-00080F-Mi for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:30:10 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:32862 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ON77R-0006rX-3p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:30:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=50594 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ON77L-0006qQ-4K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:30:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ON77J-00036O-Jm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:30:02 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:37992) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ON77J-00035L-EC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 12:30:01 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ON77F-0007up-TU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:29:58 +0200 Original-Received: from 76.103.174.124 ([76.103.174.124]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:29:57 +0200 Original-Received: from john_owens by 76.103.174.124 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 11 Jun 2010 18:29:57 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ connect(): No such file or directory Original-Lines: 17 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 76.103.174.124 (Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100413 Firefox/3.6.4 GTB7.0) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:125747 Archived-At: Stephen Eilert gmail.com> writes: > On Thu, Jun 10, 2010 at 8:30 PM, John Owens yahoo.com> wrote: > > > > - Antialiasing looks (to me) a lot worse than with Carbon Emacs > > particularly in my mailer (Wanderlust). > > Can you get some screenshots comparing the two? http://tinyurl.com/23emfxc To me the right pane (Carbon Emacs) looks a lot better than the left pane (emacs 23). This is the "Inconsolata" font. It's boldface that looks the worst to me. Perhaps this is a perception issue, but my perception is 23 took a step backwards. JDO