From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Mauger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: recentf: not applying all filters Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 15:51:26 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: References: <43CEAE16.5010206@wanadoo.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1137698411 18571 80.91.229.2 (19 Jan 2006 19:20:11 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2006 19:20:11 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 19 20:20:08 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EzfJd-0000yl-Gp for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 20:19:28 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EzfM5-0005yU-EX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 14:21:57 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ezc7y-00074k-Ud for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:55:12 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Ezc7o-00072x-DY for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:55:06 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Ezc7k-00071Z-4F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:54:57 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.229.2] (helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34) id 1EzcBn-0006QO-Ev for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:59:07 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1Ezc53-0000W1-4i for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:52:09 +0100 Original-Received: from na6mk2fw02.fidelity.com ([192.223.243.6]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:52:09 +0100 Original-Received: from mmaug by na6mk2fw02.fidelity.com with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:52:09 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 35 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org User-Agent: Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) X-Loom-IP: 192.223.243.6 (Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 6.0; Windows NT 5.1; JFV; IE 6.0 SP1 (FID r3.0); .NET CLR 1.0.3705; .NET CLR 1.1.4322)) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49261 Archived-At: David Ponce writes: > > Hi, > > > When `recentf-open-files-items' is non-nil (which it is, by default), > > then `recentf-open-files-items' does not apply the `recentf-menu-filter' > > filter. > > > > Thus if you have recentf-mode enabled, and you select the "More..." > > entry on the menu, the resulting buffer of additional recently opened > > files, will not be properly sorted (or whatever filter behavior was > > requested). > > > > Was this intentional? Is there a conflicting behavior that this avoids? > > Maybe this is because `recentf-show-file-shortcuts-flag' is t by default, > so the 10 first items, which are assigned a digit shortcut key, are shown > differently without passing them to the `recentf-menu-filter' filter. > > Could you try to disable `recentf-show-file-shortcuts-flag'? > > Sincerely, > David > I apologize because I mispoke (or mis-copied) in my original post. The opening sentence was supposed to say "When `recentf-show-file-shortcuts-flag' is non- nil (which it is, by default), ...". So, yes, turning `recentf-show-file-shortcuts-flag' off, does result in my filter being called. My question is: Is there a reason why they (recentf-show- file-shortcuts-flag and recentf-menu-filter) are mutually exclusive? -- Michael