From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Glenn Morris Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Reordering etc/NEWS Date: Mon, 07 May 2007 13:36:06 -0400 Message-ID: References: <2wmz0iriyj.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1178560915 17454 80.91.229.12 (7 May 2007 18:01:55 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 18:01:55 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 07 20:01:54 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from pat.uio.no ([129.240.10.15]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hl7Wz-0004Kq-DT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 20:01:53 +0200 Original-Received: from mail-mx8.uio.no ([129.240.10.38]) by pat.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1Hl7B4-00081j-2T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 19:39:14 +0200 Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by mail-mx8.uio.no with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.66) (envelope-from ) id 1Hl7B2-00054u-Sa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 19:39:13 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hl7I1-0005tH-Ek for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 13:46:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hl7Hw-0005m0-FV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 13:46:20 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Hl7Hv-0005hi-Gr for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 13:46:19 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Hl7Hv-0005h9-8z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 13:46:19 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hl7Av-0005Ec-6f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2007 13:39:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=localhost) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Hl783-00062b-6r; Mon, 07 May 2007 13:36:07 -0400 X-Spook: terrorist underground red noise kilderkin blackjack X-Ran: T&"oF3$&ct$VW{TrlAI\'[e_=`{?T1b3|>c7isRy)1rXkQl}717e:Q.\':>B[XV3qij*)p X-Hue: yellow X-Attribution: GM In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Mon, 07 May 2007 12:50:25 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus (www.gnus.org), GNU Emacs (www.gnu.org/software/emacs/) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: pass (mail-mx8.uio.no: domain of gnu.org designates 199.232.76.165 as permitted sender) client-ip=199.232.76.165; envelope-from=emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org; helo=lists.gnu.org; X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=0.0, required=12.0, autolearn=disabled, AWL=0.019,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001) X-UiO-Scanned: A420E7FC7172281FC0EB28AEAC31198BAFF72F71 X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 199.232.76.165 spam_score: 0 maxlevel 200 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 22 total 6332 max/h 41 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0 Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70627 Archived-At: Richard Stallman wrote: > Thus, the message as a whole constitutes badgering. It demanded that > I state my "current release plan", and to back up this demand, it made > a mountain out of this 2-week molehill. For the record, I disagree with your statements that I was "badgering" you and "making demands". I can certainly understand you feeling besieged at the moment, and obviously I can't be objective about how my message reads. Anyway, apologies to all for triggering a non-productive thread. Let's move on.